haagen_dazs
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2009
- Messages
- 781
I refer to Todd L. Gray''s 3rd post in this thread.
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/h-a-certificate-does-the-lab-make-a-big-difference.48961/
"The presence or lack of a H&A pattern is not a reliable indication as to the light return of the diamond, nor does it have a direct bearing on the color of the diamond. However, the proportions of the diamond AND the precision of the faceting and consistency of the angles that make up the high and low range that determines the average measurement of those angles that appears on the lab reports does have a direct effect on the potential light return of a diamond..."
I am still learning,
The 2nd part of the paragraph makes sense but I wanted to get some clarification on the first part.
I thought H&A = optical symmetry.
Doesn''t a optically cut help assist in return as much light as possible?
In order for the H&A to appear nicely when viewed by a person, doesn''t the tolerances for the facet angles have to be tight else the symmetry will be wonky or skewed?
If there are more resources on this topic regarding the first part of the paragraph, could someone point in the right direction?
It sounds like a SARIN report is pretty important based on the stand taken in the 2nd part pf the paragraph.
Are there examples of a diamond that lacks a H&A pattern and yet gives even better light return that a diamond that has one?
I am sure my logic/understanding is flawed in some ways hence these questions.
THANKS!!
https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/h-a-certificate-does-the-lab-make-a-big-difference.48961/
"The presence or lack of a H&A pattern is not a reliable indication as to the light return of the diamond, nor does it have a direct bearing on the color of the diamond. However, the proportions of the diamond AND the precision of the faceting and consistency of the angles that make up the high and low range that determines the average measurement of those angles that appears on the lab reports does have a direct effect on the potential light return of a diamond..."
I am still learning,
The 2nd part of the paragraph makes sense but I wanted to get some clarification on the first part.
I thought H&A = optical symmetry.
Doesn''t a optically cut help assist in return as much light as possible?
In order for the H&A to appear nicely when viewed by a person, doesn''t the tolerances for the facet angles have to be tight else the symmetry will be wonky or skewed?
If there are more resources on this topic regarding the first part of the paragraph, could someone point in the right direction?
It sounds like a SARIN report is pretty important based on the stand taken in the 2nd part pf the paragraph.
Are there examples of a diamond that lacks a H&A pattern and yet gives even better light return that a diamond that has one?
I am sure my logic/understanding is flawed in some ways hence these questions.
THANKS!!
