- Joined
- May 15, 2014
- Messages
- 6,150
Interesting. Although I agree it's a good idea to stage a project so you aren't on a time crunch I have the philosophy that it's bad for the customer and vendor to become too laxed and let a project linger on with no real time line to complete.
I think it's to the vendors benefit as well as they can properly schedule work, collect payments and ensure a good cash flow while maintaining a steady balance. There is a lot to be said for having good control of your operations. It allows you to grow smart and adjust your pricing to maximize profit based on demand and available capacity.
I'm not saying that it is best for their cash flow. But I work with the same vendor all the time and generally get excellent attention from them. So if I say "no rush" and it's a busy time of year, they know, and I know, that I mean what I say. I also know that many of their customers are truly in a rush, and often more demanding than I am. And I also know that if I send them my idea of a project at a very busy time of year that they are in fact busy. So I can either wait to send it to them later or expect some delay. I like to send my thoughts when my ideas are solidified so that I don't wander off in my thoughts and second guess myself. But when I do have a timeline (I think I did once a few years ago) they knew that it was important and delivered the piece to me in record time. I just don't see the point in putting pressure on the turn around time if its due only to impatience and nothing else. Other customers probably have better reasons for that.