Poor ASET image, or something else?

[hobbes]

I''m trying to decide between two diamonds and using the ASET images as a form of comparison. Both are of top quality but the first ASET image is rather blurred when compared to the second. Could it be the first ASET image was taken off focus? What do you think?

0.792 ct E VS2 Whiteflash ACA
. Carat: 0.792
. Depth %: 61
. Table %: 55.1
. Crown Angle: 34.9
. Crown %: 15.7
. Star : 52
. Pavilion Angle: 40.7
. Pavilion %: 42.9
. Lower Girdle %: 77
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 5.97-6.01X3.66
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
ASET Image http://www.whiteflash.com/pimg/ASET/AST_AGS-10284405.jpg


0.727 ct E VS1 Whiteflash ACA
. Carat: 0.727
. Depth %: 61
. Table %: 55.3
. Crown Angle: 34.6
. Crown %: 15.4
. Star : 53
. Pavilion Angle: 40.7
. Pavilion %: 42.8
. Lower Girdle %: 78
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 5.81-5.83X3.55
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible
ASET Image http://www.whiteflash.com/pimg/ASET/AST_AGS-9877001.jpg

 

[Lorelei]

Hi Hobbes

With the first ASET it is probably just the photography, tilt, reflections or technique - probably nothing to worry about - however the Idealscope of the first also looks as if it might be tilted so I would check it with WF.