Plz help me narrow down the choices

[jady_cat]

1.http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-VVS2-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1121281.asp?b=16&a=12&c=77&cid=131

2.http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/4299/

3.http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/3283/

4.http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/3089/

No.2/No 3/No 4 all have medium fluorescence.I hope I won''t see any blue hue or cloudness


Thank you for your time !

 

[ImpatientOne]

Just MHO, but I like the stones in this order:

#3 Gorgeous stone, and a lot cheaper than the others
#2
#4
#1

 

[jady_cat]

Thanks !ImpatientOne

The JA stone actually increased more than $1000 in the past 2 days...

Do you have any opinions on medium fluorescence?

 

[Ellen]

I can''t really compare the JA stone, as there is no Idealscope pic, and I''m not sure they''ll give you one. I''m also not crazy about their upgrade policy, if there''s even the slightest chance you might need it.

Personally, I like the E VS2 best, that gets my vote!

 

[ImpatientOne]

Date: 4/18/2008 12:58:35 PM
Author: jady_cat
Thanks !ImpatientOne

The JA stone actually increased more than $1000 in the past 2 days...

Do you have any opinions on medium fluorescence?

Medium flourescence should not impact these stones, from what I understand.

 

[NeverEndingUpgrade]

I''d probably pick #3 because you still get a lot of diamond for your money without much difference in size. Unless you are set on gettting a 2 ct.

 

[jady_cat]

Bump ! still seeking opinions

 

[jady_cat]

bump again ! Thank you all !

 

[Showmethefire]

Date: 4/18/2008 11:16:16 AM
Author:jady_cat
1.http://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-VVS2-Ideal-Cut-Round-Diamond-1121281.asp?b=16&a=12&c=77&cid=131


2.http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/4299/


3.http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/3283/


4.http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/3089/


No.2/No 3/No 4 all have medium fluorescence.I hope I won''t see any blue hue or cloudness



Thank you for your time !

Hi! I personally like #3. If you look at the Diamxray photograph of #3, you will realise that there are more "hotspots" (the black portions other than the arrows) than the other diamonds,esp at the arrow shafts (which are lacking in the other diamonds) increasing the scintillation of the diamond itself. The "hotspots" at the star facets also appear quite even. You could probably ask GOG for their helium reports on #3 diamond. If you want to understand more about helium reports, you can read this link http://www.goodoldgold.com/Technologies/DiamondScanners/Helium/

Take your time, ask Jonathan or anybody else from goodoldgold as many questions as you want about these diamonds. They are very patient, honest, candid and are not pushy at all.

 

[jady_cat]

Thank you for the Helium thing Showmethefire

I''ll ask Jon for more info !

 

[nani565]

Hey!!

In my opinion my favorite is the seconds one, then i like 3rd one and then the 4th and last the 1st one. My opinions are solely based on aesthetics since i really dont know much about diamonds. How come the JA diamonds look so different than the WF and GOG diamonds?

 

[jady_cat]

JA diamond is not a H & A.I guess that''s the reason they look so different