Please provide feedback on these diamond specs

[dkidsun]

Hi, I think I've narrowed my search down to a diamond with the below specs. Please let me know your thoughts and what you would think the price range should be. Main concern is the larger-than-ideal table % causing the idealscope to appear slightly less bright in the middle.

AGS 000
Carat 1.52
Color H
Clarity SI1

Proportions
Table 58.7% (is this too large?)
Depth 60.8%
Crown 34.9
Pavilion 40.7
14.5% / 43% / Thin to med /faceted

Image below

Please let me know your thoughts! Thanks in advance.

 

[Gypsy]

I think it's a nice stone. Can you get an ideal scope. I'm not worried about the table, as the angles are good and work together well.

To be honest, I'm kinda smitten with it. I hope it ASETs out well.

 

[dkidsun]

I think it's a nice stone. Can you get an ideal scope. I'm not worried about the table, as the angles are good and work together well.

To be honest, I'm kinda smitten with it. I hope it ASETs out well.

Do you generally care about the idealscope outside of the one that's provided on the AGS certificate (which looks fantastic to me btw)?

 

[diamondseeker2006]

With AGS000 and that image, I don't need another image, personally. FYI, the larger table generally means a brighter stone. (What you may be perceiving about brightness has to do with photography. There is no darkness in the center of that stone.) It's close to a 60/60 type stone. You forgot to give the diameter, but I expect it has a nice spread with that depth. It is a very nice stone if it is the type you prefer!

 

[diamondseeker2006]

For pricing, I see one superideal cut hearts and arrows AGS 000 1.52 H SI1 at $15,300, so I would expect this stone to cost less than that.

 

[Gypsy]

I really do like it. And I missed that it is an AGS0. Those proportions and the AGS0 is all I need as well.

 

[SirGuy]

I like it. One might consider whether you'd get proportionally a little more brightness, or white light return, with a slightly bigger table like this. The table is not too big though, and is preferable to a more shallow crown angle here.

It sure looks nice, and should perform very well!