#1 AGS cert.
1.64ct E VS2 H&A
AGS000 cut
Table 54.6
Depth 61.6
Crown 34.5
Pavil 40.8
HCA 1.1
BScope (VH, VH, VH)
Flour.: None
Diam.: 7.60 - 7.61mm
NOTES: Symmetry is VERY high on all facets (e.g., stone is only 0.01mm off of being perfectly round). Appraiser stated it was probably one of the ten best stones he''s seen in terms of precision of cut. Only has one cloud under table and one feather and a few pinpoints spread elsewhere, thus graded independently as being a close to a VS1. Very, very beautiful in person. Also, I like the seller a lot (definite plus).
#2 AGS cert.
1.68ct F VVS1 (uncertain regarding H&A)
AGS000 cut
Table 55
Depth 60.8
Crown 34.5
Pavil 40.8
HCA 1.2
BScope: N/A
Flour.: N/A
Diam.: 7.71 - 7.76mm
NOTES: I haven''t seen the cert for this stone or seen this stone in person yet. All other things being equal, it appears to be a better value (Down one color, up two clarity grades, slightly bigger), even with the probable drop in cut quality. I also have less information on this stone (is it H&A, flouressence)?
The question is, if #2 is a better value - how much better? I''ve already gotten stone #1 appraised (pre purchase) by a good third party appraiser. Should I bring in stone #2 and incur the extra expense and effort? Should I request a Sarin/MegaScope on #2 first (to gauge symmetry, etc., on my own)? I''ve been offered both stones at equivalent prices.
Thanks in advance!
shyguy
1.64ct E VS2 H&A
AGS000 cut
Table 54.6
Depth 61.6
Crown 34.5
Pavil 40.8
HCA 1.1
BScope (VH, VH, VH)
Flour.: None
Diam.: 7.60 - 7.61mm
NOTES: Symmetry is VERY high on all facets (e.g., stone is only 0.01mm off of being perfectly round). Appraiser stated it was probably one of the ten best stones he''s seen in terms of precision of cut. Only has one cloud under table and one feather and a few pinpoints spread elsewhere, thus graded independently as being a close to a VS1. Very, very beautiful in person. Also, I like the seller a lot (definite plus).
#2 AGS cert.
1.68ct F VVS1 (uncertain regarding H&A)
AGS000 cut
Table 55
Depth 60.8
Crown 34.5
Pavil 40.8
HCA 1.2
BScope: N/A
Flour.: N/A
Diam.: 7.71 - 7.76mm
NOTES: I haven''t seen the cert for this stone or seen this stone in person yet. All other things being equal, it appears to be a better value (Down one color, up two clarity grades, slightly bigger), even with the probable drop in cut quality. I also have less information on this stone (is it H&A, flouressence)?
The question is, if #2 is a better value - how much better? I''ve already gotten stone #1 appraised (pre purchase) by a good third party appraiser. Should I bring in stone #2 and incur the extra expense and effort? Should I request a Sarin/MegaScope on #2 first (to gauge symmetry, etc., on my own)? I''ve been offered both stones at equivalent prices.
Thanks in advance!
shyguy
