Please help me make decision between these 2 diamond.

[luvses]

Choice #1

0.53 carat F VVS1 0.9-EX-EX-EX-VG
AGS0 H&A
Dept: 62.1%
Table: 53.2%
Crown Angle: 34.5°
Pavilion Angle: 40.6°
Gridle: thn-med
Measurement: 5.17*5.21*3.22

http://www.jamesallen.com/diamond.asp?find=1&cid=130&item=1060510

Choice #2

0.527 Carat F VVS2 1.0-EX-EX-EX-VG
. Depth %: 61.2
. Table %: 55
. Crown Angle: 34.7
. Crown %: 15.6
. Star : 51
. Pavilion Angle: 40.7
. Pavilion %: 42.9
. Lower Girdle %: 77
. Girdle: Thin Faceted
. Measurements: 5.22-5.24X3.20
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible

http://www.whiteflash.com/hearts_arrows/A-Cut-Above-H-A-cut-diamond-636686.htm#

I think Choice #1 is better deal but I am not sure if A-Cut-Above-H-A from Whiteflash (Choice #2) is better than the cut from Choice #1. What do you think? Please guide me. Thank you.

 

[ImpatientOne]

JMHO, but I vote for #2. You can't go wrong with a WF ACA - it's a top notch cut. The table on that 1st one is really small but I don't know if that would adversly effect the stones performance. Maybe one of the experts will chime in.

Also, if you ever plan on upgrading, WF has a much better trade in policy.

 

[Kim N]

I agree, I vote for the WF ACA. Both are ideal cut H&A stones, but I personally prefer the numbers on the WF stone. The depth is just a tad high and the table just a tad small on the JA stone.

 

[sugarplum]

i agree with impatientone and kim and also vote for #2. the table on stone #1 is small. the specs of the ACA stone are more "balanced".

 

[Lorelei]

I would pick the ACA.

 

[luvses]

Thank you everyone..then choice #2. I''m glad that I found this website. It helps me a lot with diamond buying.