I need some expert advice. I''ve narrowed down my search to three Whiteflash ACA princess cuts. The three are very similar, the only major differences are the girdle, the Ideal Scope images (but are the differences significant enough for the price difference between #1 and #2?), and the price. By the way, is G too risky for a princess cut? Thanks!
Diamond #1 - http://www.whiteflash.com/aca_princess/A-Cut-Above-Princess-cut-diamond-617022.htm
. Color: G
. Clarity: VS2
. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 1.008
. Depth %: 75.6
. Table %: 68.4
. Girdle: Faceted Thin
. Light Performance: 0
$5710
Diamond #2 - http://www.whiteflash.com/aca_princess/A-Cut-Above-Princess-cut-diamond-617016.htm
. Color: G
. Clarity: VS2
. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 1.064
. Depth %: 75.4
. Table %: 67.5
. Girdle: Thin to Medium
. Light Performance: 0
$6053
Diamond #3 - http://www.whiteflash.com/aca_princess/A-Cut-Above-Princess-cut-diamond-617019.htm
. Color: G
. Clarity: VS1
. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 1.014
. Depth %: 74.4
. Table %: 70.4
. Girdle: Medium
. Light Performance: 0
$6334
Possible issues with all three: #1 has a thin girdle, #2''s inclusions are in the center of the table, and #3 is more expensive than either of the two (is it worth it?).

Diamond #1 - http://www.whiteflash.com/aca_princess/A-Cut-Above-Princess-cut-diamond-617022.htm
. Color: G
. Clarity: VS2
. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 1.008
. Depth %: 75.6
. Table %: 68.4
. Girdle: Faceted Thin
. Light Performance: 0
$5710
Diamond #2 - http://www.whiteflash.com/aca_princess/A-Cut-Above-Princess-cut-diamond-617016.htm
. Color: G
. Clarity: VS2
. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 1.064
. Depth %: 75.4
. Table %: 67.5
. Girdle: Thin to Medium
. Light Performance: 0
$6053
Diamond #3 - http://www.whiteflash.com/aca_princess/A-Cut-Above-Princess-cut-diamond-617019.htm
. Color: G
. Clarity: VS1
. Shape: A Cut Above Princess
. Carat: 1.014
. Depth %: 74.4
. Table %: 70.4
. Girdle: Medium
. Light Performance: 0
$6334
Possible issues with all three: #1 has a thin girdle, #2''s inclusions are in the center of the table, and #3 is more expensive than either of the two (is it worth it?).