Hello everyone! I''ve been lots of reading trying to educate myself on stones in the last few weeks. I just found this sight earlier tonight, and I wish I would have found it alot sooner! Anyways, I spent a LONG weekend in Houston looking at stones in stores. I wasn''t very impressed at any of the stores. Prices in general were not competitive, or they didn''t have good certifications on them, or the sales person didn''t know what they were talking about (one said flour was super bad on a stone), another said platinum is softer than white gold) although the experience of using a loop (I think thats what it is), looking at stones, etc was very good.
After that I determined I was going to use an online store to get the stone. I looked at BN on the recommendation from a friend at work, and all was well. I thought I made my desicion. Then I read on here. I spent some more time looking at GOG and WF, but for my particular wants, I didn''t find any blazing deals over BN. Anyways, I would just like a bit of input from all of you about these two stones.
first one here: (GOG)
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/4710/
Shape: Round
Carat Weight: 0.75ct
Color: G
Clarity: VS2
AGS Cut Grade: Ideal
Optical Symmetry: Superior
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Fluorescence: None
Culet: None
Lab Report: AGS
Lab Report #: 9751601
In House: Yes
Width: 5.79mm
Length: 5.84mm
Depth: 3.61mm
Table Percentage: 55.60%
Depth Percentage: 62.00%
Crown ∠: 34.90°
Crown Depth: 15.30%
Pavilion ∠: 40.70°
Pavilion Depth: 43.00%
This seems like a nice diamond (on paper... which doesn''t mean much
) all in all. It the right size and quality I was aiming for. The big pros for this stone are that GOG has the trade-up policy while BN does not, BUT I know my future wife (hopefully
) doesn''t want anything bigger.
Here is the second stone, BN
http://www.bluenile.com/round-diamond-1-carat-or-less-signature-ideal-cut-f-color-vs2-clarity_LD01309133?__fun_frm=i&filter_id=0#grading_report
Shape: Round
Carat Weight: 0.70ct
Color: G
Clarity: VS2
CUT: BN SIG. Ideal
Polish: BN SIG. Ideal
Symmetry: BN SIG. Ideal
Fluorescence: None
Culet: 0.03mm
Lab Report: GIA, GCAL
Width: 5.73mm
Length: 5.75mm
Depth: 3.54mm
Table Percentage: 56%
Depth Percentage: 61.7%
Crown ∠: 34.0°
Crown Depth: 15.0%
Pavilion ∠: 41.2°
Pavilion Depth: 43.50%
The only thing about this stone I am curious of is, it lists the girdle as "thin to meduim". I heard there are possible durability issues (ie chipping) with thin enough girdles. Also this doesn''t have an AGS rating, only GIA and GCAL, and the more I read here, the more it sounds like AGS is the holy grail of ratings (assuming its a good one
)
Any input you have would be great help! Thanks alot guys!
After that I determined I was going to use an online store to get the stone. I looked at BN on the recommendation from a friend at work, and all was well. I thought I made my desicion. Then I read on here. I spent some more time looking at GOG and WF, but for my particular wants, I didn''t find any blazing deals over BN. Anyways, I would just like a bit of input from all of you about these two stones.
first one here: (GOG)
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/4710/
Shape: Round
Carat Weight: 0.75ct
Color: G
Clarity: VS2
AGS Cut Grade: Ideal
Optical Symmetry: Superior
Polish: Ideal
Symmetry: Ideal
Fluorescence: None
Culet: None
Lab Report: AGS
Lab Report #: 9751601
In House: Yes
Width: 5.79mm
Length: 5.84mm
Depth: 3.61mm
Table Percentage: 55.60%
Depth Percentage: 62.00%
Crown ∠: 34.90°
Crown Depth: 15.30%
Pavilion ∠: 40.70°
Pavilion Depth: 43.00%
This seems like a nice diamond (on paper... which doesn''t mean much


Here is the second stone, BN
http://www.bluenile.com/round-diamond-1-carat-or-less-signature-ideal-cut-f-color-vs2-clarity_LD01309133?__fun_frm=i&filter_id=0#grading_report
Shape: Round
Carat Weight: 0.70ct
Color: G
Clarity: VS2
CUT: BN SIG. Ideal
Polish: BN SIG. Ideal
Symmetry: BN SIG. Ideal
Fluorescence: None
Culet: 0.03mm
Lab Report: GIA, GCAL
Width: 5.73mm
Length: 5.75mm
Depth: 3.54mm
Table Percentage: 56%
Depth Percentage: 61.7%
Crown ∠: 34.0°
Crown Depth: 15.0%
Pavilion ∠: 41.2°
Pavilion Depth: 43.50%
The only thing about this stone I am curious of is, it lists the girdle as "thin to meduim". I heard there are possible durability issues (ie chipping) with thin enough girdles. Also this doesn''t have an AGS rating, only GIA and GCAL, and the more I read here, the more it sounds like AGS is the holy grail of ratings (assuming its a good one

Any input you have would be great help! Thanks alot guys!