elliemay
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2012
- Messages
- 260
Just had my eBay OEC appraised and am going to keep it.
I'm torn between two settings, though. Which of these do you think would look best with a channel set eternity ring (1.5 pointers) on a size 9 finger?
The stone to be set is a 1.21 M VS1 OEC.
Here's the first one -- I like the ornate filigree, the fact that the diamond sits quite low in the setting, and the shinyness of it (since it seems sort of unusual to find a vintage style ring without any milgrain at all). My concern with this one is the shape of the ring -- is it shaped too much like a class ring? http://www.engagement-ring-mountings.com/antique_ring_settings_info_1669.htm#more_pictures

And here's the second one -- I like the prongs a lot and I like the engraving (probably because that's what I'm used to having). My concern with this one is a lack of finger converage -- I'd be going from a halo, so I feel like the stone would feel small and naked, if that makes any sense at all! http://antiqueengagementrings.com/shopping/shopexd.asp?id=169

The stone to be set is a 1.21 M VS1 OEC.
Here's the first one -- I like the ornate filigree, the fact that the diamond sits quite low in the setting, and the shinyness of it (since it seems sort of unusual to find a vintage style ring without any milgrain at all). My concern with this one is the shape of the ring -- is it shaped too much like a class ring? http://www.engagement-ring-mountings.com/antique_ring_settings_info_1669.htm#more_pictures

And here's the second one -- I like the prongs a lot and I like the engraving (probably because that's what I'm used to having). My concern with this one is a lack of finger converage -- I'd be going from a halo, so I feel like the stone would feel small and naked, if that makes any sense at all! http://antiqueengagementrings.com/shopping/shopexd.asp?id=169
