Please HELP! Final 2!

[ShulinaOY]

Hi all,

Which is better?

1. Whiteflash, A cut above, 0.713ct, H, SI1 - feather (top left, potentially covered by a prong) ($3135)
Depth % 61.7
Table % 55.7
Crown Angle 34.7
Pavilion Angle 40.7
Measurements 5.72x5.74x3.54


2. Jamesallen, Triple EX GIA, 0.67ct, G, VVS2 - pinpoint ($2840)
Depth % 61.8
Table % 56
Crown Angle 34
Pavilion Angle 41
Measurements 5.61x5.63x3.47


Thank you!

 

[danielxlin]

WF by a mile. Bigger face-up size, better cut, better light performance, negligible inclusions.

 

[ShulinaOY]

WF by a mile. Bigger face-up size, better cut, better light performance, negligible inclusions.

Even though the clarity of WF diamond is down by 3 grades? And the colour is also down by 1 grade? Based on the idealscope images provided wouldn't the JA have similar light performance? At least to an untrained eye?

 

[diamondseeker2006]

At this size, I'd definitely go with the larger one, which just happens to also be the best cut.

 

[ShulinaOY]

At this size, I'd definitely go with the larger one, which just happens to also be the best cut.

Thanks!
So a better cut trumps colour and clarity and is worth a premium of about 200 USD?

 

[ecf8503]

At this size, I'd definitely go with the larger one, which just happens to also be the best cut.

Thanks!
So a better cut trumps colour and clarity and is worth a premium of about 200 USD?

Heck yeah it does!!!!!