Please help critic my e-ring choices

[ronan]

Thanks everyone for your help with my past query. I found yet another stone that seemed to have lower light leakage than the ones I had been considering but I am not very good at reading IS images. I will be grateful for your comments on the following three and which in your opinion is a better stone. They are all very comparable in price.

Also, is there a noticeable difference between F and G color?


1) 1.072 Carat, F, SI1

. Carat: 1.072
. Depth %: 61.4
. Table %: 56.7
. Crown Angle: 34.5
. Crown %: 15
. Star : 54
. Pavilion Angle: 40.6
. Pavilion %: 42.7
. Lower Girdle %: 77
. Girdle: Thin to Slightly Thick Faceted
. Measurements: 6.54-6.56X4.02
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible


2) 1.068 Carat, F, SI1

. Carat: 1.068
. Depth %: 61
. Table %: 56.8
. Crown Angle: 34.6
. Crown %: 15
. Star : 55
. Pavilion Angle: 40.6
. Pavilion %: 42.7
. Lower Girdle %: 78
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 6.55-6.60X4.02
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible

3) 1.025 Carat, G, VS2

. Carat: 1.025
. Depth %: 61.1
. Table %: 56.8
. Crown Angle: 34.6
. Crown %: 15
. Star : 55
. Pavilion Angle: 40.7
. Pavilion %: 42.9
. Lower Girdle %: 76
. Girdle: Thin to Medium Faceted
. Measurements: 6.49-6.51X3.97
. Light Performance: 0
. Polish: Ideal
. Symmetry: Ideal
. Culet: Pointed
. Fluorescence: Negligible


The IS images for the three are attached below.

Thanks for your help!

 

[ronan]

Couldnt figure out how to attach multiple files. The one attached above in my initial message is for (1) 1.072 F SI1.

This post contains the IS image for 1.068 F SI1

 

[ronan]

And lastly, the 1.025 G VS2.

Thanks again!

 

[strmrdr]

To the eye they would look very close to identical.
Are the first 2 eyeclean?

I would go with the cheapest one assuming all are eyeclean.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 7/7/2009 3:39:12 AM
Author: strmrdr
To the eye they would look very close to identical.
Are the first 2 eyeclean?

I would go with the cheapest one assuming all are eyeclean.

Ditto strmy!

 

[stone-cold11]

thritto.

 

[ronan]

Thank you Strmdr, Lorelei and Stone-cold11.

I took your advise and went with the cheapest of the lot which happens to be the 1.072, F, SI1. I confirmed with WF that it is indeed eye-clean from front and side.

I am working with them on a custom setting if I can get it within my timeframe/budget. If not, plan to go with the stock halo bezel setting.

Thanks again for your help.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 7/7/2009 11:50:32 AM
Author: ronan


Thank you Strmdr, Lorelei and Stone-cold11.

I took your advise and went with the cheapest of the lot which happens to be the 1.072, F, SI1. I confirmed with WF that it is indeed eye-clean from front and side.

I am working with them on a custom setting if I can get it within my timeframe/budget. If not, plan to go with the stock halo bezel setting.

Thanks again for your help.

Congrats and you are most welcome!