Please comment on these two rocks...

[Levin]

Recall my earlier post: https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/size-constraints-when-replacing-existing-stone-in-vatche-rc-setting.124195/

The consultant at WF recommended these two:

http://www.whiteflash.com/round/Round-cut-diamond-2181555.htm

http://www.whiteflash.com/round/Round-cut-diamond-2105153.htm

Comments? What are these odds that these are "eye clean?" The first one seems like a good buy, but I''m concerned that it''s SI2 based on clouds not pictured, and that it might appear cloudy to the educated naked eye.

THANKS! Pricescope is a priceless resource.

 

[yssie]

#1 - IS/ASET look great.
#2 - leaks like a sieve.

Eyeclean SI2s are possible, they're just tough to find. The clouds statement under "comments" is just for completeness, no need to worry about that. Decide what "eyeclean" means to you, and ask your WF rep if the stone qualifies.

Now I'll say that I don't think the chances are good by my definition (nothing visible face up from 10in) - that's gotta be one big crystal blob staring you in the face for it to be the only grade maker! But I haven't seen the stone, I could well be wrong

 

[Lorelei]

First one looks good, just clarify with WF as in this case the "clarity grade is based on clouds which are not shown" that these aren't impacting brilliance as these are setting the SI2 grade, I doubt it with a hand selected diamond from this company but it does not hurt to check. Also check it is in fact eyeclean to your standards by asking WF.