Hi everyone.
We''ve picked out our diamonds -- and they are spectacular. We walked out blinded, and had the line-up (5 stones: 0.74ct, 2x0.32ct, 2x0.1ct) emblazened in our minds ever since. And it''s a fair deal price-wise.
We sent some thoughts to the designers today, and wanted your input to see if you think we provided enough information, whether there are any additional features or issues we might address, etc. We are so tremendously excited to see what the first sketches look like.
Here is what we wrote:
Basic idea:
• 5-stone diamond ring in platinum-iridium 900 alloy.
• Size 7 ¼ (to be verified again)
• Overall classic design, organic/flowing lines.
• Prongs rounded at top, delicate, minimal coverage of diamond when viewed face-up. Overall delicate look but still sturdy and secure.
• Height above finger: Fairly low profile, most important to minimize areas to snag or large steps between stones.
Setting ideas:
• See pictures below for ideas. Rounded prongs and rounded ascent from the gallery, minimizing straight lines.
• Stone setting: Continuous taper of diamond proportions when viewed from above. Stones set close together but not overlapping. Minimize metal when viewed from above.
• Gallery: Simple with organic flow, + filigree/engraving. Would like most of design to be in gallery, not extending far onto shank.
• Diamonds cover top of finger but do not extend below finger level.
Shank ideas:
• Wider band (i.e., 3-4 mm ?? Will verify), comfort-fit rounded edges.
• European style.
• Want it to be able to sit flush with wedding band.
Note: The designer should have creative license with our ideas. They are the experts, and we want it to be design-wise and structural-wise both lovely and safe/durable. And most importantly, have fun!
We''ve picked out our diamonds -- and they are spectacular. We walked out blinded, and had the line-up (5 stones: 0.74ct, 2x0.32ct, 2x0.1ct) emblazened in our minds ever since. And it''s a fair deal price-wise.
We sent some thoughts to the designers today, and wanted your input to see if you think we provided enough information, whether there are any additional features or issues we might address, etc. We are so tremendously excited to see what the first sketches look like.
Here is what we wrote:
Basic idea:
• 5-stone diamond ring in platinum-iridium 900 alloy.
• Size 7 ¼ (to be verified again)
• Overall classic design, organic/flowing lines.
• Prongs rounded at top, delicate, minimal coverage of diamond when viewed face-up. Overall delicate look but still sturdy and secure.
• Height above finger: Fairly low profile, most important to minimize areas to snag or large steps between stones.
Setting ideas:
• See pictures below for ideas. Rounded prongs and rounded ascent from the gallery, minimizing straight lines.
• Stone setting: Continuous taper of diamond proportions when viewed from above. Stones set close together but not overlapping. Minimize metal when viewed from above.
• Gallery: Simple with organic flow, + filigree/engraving. Would like most of design to be in gallery, not extending far onto shank.
• Diamonds cover top of finger but do not extend below finger level.
Shank ideas:
• Wider band (i.e., 3-4 mm ?? Will verify), comfort-fit rounded edges.
• European style.
• Want it to be able to sit flush with wedding band.
Note: The designer should have creative license with our ideas. They are the experts, and we want it to be design-wise and structural-wise both lovely and safe/durable. And most importantly, have fun!