Opinions

[SH]

Hi Everyone,

This is my first post, but I''ve been reading for quite a while now.
I have found a few stones that I am interested in and have had some pictures taken of one of them.

Here are the specs:

1.43
G
VS2
Depth 74.7%
Table 70.9%
Girdle TK
Pol Ex
Sym VG
Culet none
Fluo none

5.98 X 5.97 X 4.46

All of the specs looked good to me... I''m just a little concerned about the leakage in the centre of the idealscope image.
Any imput on these images would be appreciated

Thanks

 

[SH]

Also, I thought I''d include the magnified image they sent me (I''m not sure the magnification??)
I haven''t figured out how to put more than one image on a post so please bear with me.

Thanks again for any input

 

[JulieN]

I feel bad because my post isn''t addressing your question. The IS image looks a lot like WF images, but I''ve never seen them have a magnified image with tweezers. I sort of wonder if the IS image was stolen.

I could be way off, here, so please excuse me if I''m wrong.

 

[JulieN]

I still think it looks nice. Hopefully a princess expert will chime in.

 

[JulieN]

This is what I go by when I look for really good princess IS

 

[JulieN]

May I rec this stone, an F SI2: http://www.elmyrservices.com/stone.php?id=54229abfcfa5649e7003b83dd4755294
from Bill at www.icemine.com

the 1.43 stone is 1 percent bigger than the 1.23...not sure if you'd even see the difference.
This BN stone, 1.42 is 6.42x6.16 http://www.bluenile.com/diamonds_details.asp?pid=LD00397293

I don't understand why the 1.43 is so small.

 

[SH]

Hi again

I just thought I''d include the numbers from the Sarin, it was late last night and I guess I forgot!
Weight: 1.43
Width: 5.97
Length: 5.99
L/W: 1.00
Total Depth: 4.46 74.7%
Table Size: 4.23 70.9%
Crown Height 0.82 13.7%
Crown Angle 46.7%
Girdle Thickness: 4.5% Thick
Girdle Min-Max: 3.8%-5.3%
Pavillion Height: 3.38 56.6%
Pavilion Avg Angle: 39.0%

JulieN thanks for all your input

And you were right, the images are from Whiteflash.
Thanks again everyone!

 

[SH]

Hi Everybody... Sorry, I don''t want to be an inconvenience but I''m really stressing about this and would still really appreciate any input on the idealscope image
Thought I''d give the message a bump in case some of you may not have seen it earlier.

I''ve read a lot about idealscopes (mostly on this forum) but I have to admit, I can''t make sense out of any of them in terms of what''s important and what doesn''t really matter

Thanks in advance for any help

 

[JulieN]

I think the stone is small for it's weight. It looks like a 1.25/1.3 princess rather than a 1.43.

I'd really check out that F/SI2.

The IS, I think it's ok.