Hi All
I''ve found what I think is an excellent stone proportion wise. It''s a GIA FVS2, EX/EX/EX but has twinning wisps (3 marked on the plot and others "not shown") and an indented natural. The wisps run across the upper halfs and just into the table. They don''t touch the girdle. The IN is located roughly half way up the junction of two UGF''s. My original thought was that as it''s a VS2 with EX polish the natural can''t be very important and I saw some threads discussing wisps which seemed to indicate that in higher clarity grades they aren''t much of an issue either.
However, I then saw a comment from Niceice saying they don''t touch stones with wisps. (Any wisps?) That sounded a bell for me, so I''d be grateful if anyone could help to clarify the position. Thanks
I''ve found what I think is an excellent stone proportion wise. It''s a GIA FVS2, EX/EX/EX but has twinning wisps (3 marked on the plot and others "not shown") and an indented natural. The wisps run across the upper halfs and just into the table. They don''t touch the girdle. The IN is located roughly half way up the junction of two UGF''s. My original thought was that as it''s a VS2 with EX polish the natural can''t be very important and I saw some threads discussing wisps which seemed to indicate that in higher clarity grades they aren''t much of an issue either.
However, I then saw a comment from Niceice saying they don''t touch stones with wisps. (Any wisps?) That sounded a bell for me, so I''d be grateful if anyone could help to clarify the position. Thanks
300x240.png)