shape
carat
color
clarity

Opinions on new scans from GOG for .59 EC

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lula
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
L

Lula

Guest
Hi, I posted about this diamond http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/6292/ in this thread https://www.pricescope.com/communit...iffs-between-crown-height-depth-angle.170310/.

I've been working with Charlie at GOG, who's been great. He sent me two new scans. He said they still aren't perfect. But much better than before! I need some help interpreting these. I know it's cut a bit deep, and that makes it face up a little small, but I'm willing to live with a little extra depth if the stone has a tall, not flat, crown. Most of the emerald cuts I've seen have very shallow crowns and look flat, with tiny little steps. The price is right, and it's got the l x w ratio I want for a specific project.

So my questions are:
Is the crown height accurate on these scans?
If so, 16+ % would be a nice crown height, right? (Not flat).
There are only two steps on the crown, instead of three -- how does this affect the appearance/sparkle/flash of the stone?
Does crown angle have any meaning when assessing an emerald cut? (41.3%)

Still waiting to hear from GOG on the answer to Karl's question on how this stone handles tilt.

Thanks for your help on this!

Pic2.jpg
 
Oh, these are posting really small. Have to figure out how to increase size.
 
Trying again...

Pic1.jpg
 
Bigger version of pavilion scan...

Pic2.jpg
 
Okay, those photos still look really small on my screen. One more time.

Pic1.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies. Please create a new topic or request for this thread to be opened.
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top