- Joined
- Sep 15, 2013
- Messages
- 1,103
Hi there!
I've never started thread here, but I'd love your thoughts on my first pair of studs. They are a present to wear for FI & I's upcoming wedding, so we'd love for them to be a forever pair. They are a pair of BGD signature 1.06 tcw, E/SI1's, both labeled eye clean and scoring below a 2 on the HCA. FI and I picked them out because they seemed the most well-matched in terms of size and the H&A patterning with the ASETs & Idealscope images and because each was labeled as eye-clean. We have received them, and we think they are stunning - they are also the first ideal stones that either of us have ever seen.
We're within the return period, so I thought I would check to see what you think or them or if any of you would have any reservations at all. No doubt about it - we think they're gorgeous - really, I've never seen anything like them in real life. BGD was great to work with, and I can't imagine a world where anyone goes wrong picking BGD signature stones. But, we're novices, so I thought cautious optimism would be prudent and that it's always better to ask than not
Here are the links to the stones and their info/images/reports:
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/0.528-e-si1-round-diamond-ags-c-104063434027
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/0.531-e-si1-round-diamond-ags-104051366037
I can see the H&A patterning, and they appear eye clean to me (though I think I might have the appraised within the return period to check, and for insurance purposes, so I don't worry about losing them all the time, notwithstanding screwbacks). They are both bright as can be and super fiery. However, the AGL light imaging for the stone ending in -027 is a little muddied in the center as compared to the ASET or either the imaging and ASET for the stone ending in -037. I feel like other threads have suggested that one trust the ASET moreso than the AGL imaging, in which case - awesome! That and ASETs have gradations of color as opposed to the stark red, blue, green, and gray in the AGL imagining, so maybe it's not as telling for this reason? In either case, I just wanted to check.
I haven't had a chance to take pretty SMTB-type pics or that would in any way do the stones justice, but I attached a quick ear shot (so hard to take!). Too much for eventual day-to-day wear? I tried on pairs at difference weights, and even down to a half tcw looks large on me, but I figure they'll shrink in size as I get used to them - gotta love DSS
Any and all thoughts are welcome - I really appreciate it!

I've never started thread here, but I'd love your thoughts on my first pair of studs. They are a present to wear for FI & I's upcoming wedding, so we'd love for them to be a forever pair. They are a pair of BGD signature 1.06 tcw, E/SI1's, both labeled eye clean and scoring below a 2 on the HCA. FI and I picked them out because they seemed the most well-matched in terms of size and the H&A patterning with the ASETs & Idealscope images and because each was labeled as eye-clean. We have received them, and we think they are stunning - they are also the first ideal stones that either of us have ever seen.
We're within the return period, so I thought I would check to see what you think or them or if any of you would have any reservations at all. No doubt about it - we think they're gorgeous - really, I've never seen anything like them in real life. BGD was great to work with, and I can't imagine a world where anyone goes wrong picking BGD signature stones. But, we're novices, so I thought cautious optimism would be prudent and that it's always better to ask than not
Here are the links to the stones and their info/images/reports:
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/0.528-e-si1-round-diamond-ags-c-104063434027
http://www.briangavindiamonds.com/diamonds/diamond-details/0.531-e-si1-round-diamond-ags-104051366037
I can see the H&A patterning, and they appear eye clean to me (though I think I might have the appraised within the return period to check, and for insurance purposes, so I don't worry about losing them all the time, notwithstanding screwbacks). They are both bright as can be and super fiery. However, the AGL light imaging for the stone ending in -027 is a little muddied in the center as compared to the ASET or either the imaging and ASET for the stone ending in -037. I feel like other threads have suggested that one trust the ASET moreso than the AGL imaging, in which case - awesome! That and ASETs have gradations of color as opposed to the stark red, blue, green, and gray in the AGL imagining, so maybe it's not as telling for this reason? In either case, I just wanted to check.
I haven't had a chance to take pretty SMTB-type pics or that would in any way do the stones justice, but I attached a quick ear shot (so hard to take!). Too much for eventual day-to-day wear? I tried on pairs at difference weights, and even down to a half tcw looks large on me, but I figure they'll shrink in size as I get used to them - gotta love DSS
Any and all thoughts are welcome - I really appreciate it!
