Opinions on 1.39 Round

[DapperDan]

Opinion on this diamond I am considering:

GIA certificate

1.39 ct
Color: G
Clarity: SI-1
Cut: Excellent
Total depth: 60.7%
Table: 56%
crown angle: 32.5 degrees
crown height: 14%
pavilion angle: 41.2 degrees
pavilion depth: 43.5%
very small culet
polish: vg
symmetry: vg
no fluorescence
7.25-7.29 x 4.41 mm

Asking price is $8600.00

 

[JulieN]

Have you seen it? The numbers are fine, although the price is a tad high, IMO, considering the VG finish marks and the shallower crown/deeper pavilion combination compared to a Tolkowsky. It is a rare carat weight. B&M markup?

 

[Giangi]

The rare size-point is probably bringing a markup. Numbers are fine, but, as Julie pointed out, pricing seems a bit steep on this one. Pickings are really slim at this size, but a quick search suggests you can find better cuts in the G-H, VVS-VS range weighing 1.25ct or so at a lower price.

 

[DapperDan]

It is being offered at a B&M.

 

[Giangi]

Pricing is indeed in line with B&M. Do you have a particular reason for choosing buying locally over the internet? Is the extra expense worth it for you?

 

[DapperDan]

I am not against buying my stone from an internet vendor. However, as you pointed out, a stone at this size is rare. It faces up close to some 1.5 carat stones and it is cut to look quite beautiful. I haven''t seen a peer on the internet yet--but I''m always looking.

 

[strmrdr]

what is the girdle rating?
With that crown angle it needs to be at least med or durability may be an issue.

 

[DapperDan]

Thin to slightly thick.

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 9/9/2006 9:28:03 PM
Author: DapperDan
Thin to slightly thick.

needs an expert in person eval. to see if there is a durability issue in my opinion.

 

[DapperDan]

As to durability, if I purchase insurance, this shouldn''t be an issue. Correct?

 

[diamondseeker2006]

I''ve only heard that very thin girdles are of concern, so I''m not clear on why Storm said anything to you re: durability.

 

[JulieN]

Date: 9/10/2006 2:26:46 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
I''ve only heard that very thin girdles are of concern, so I''m not clear on why Storm said anything to you re: durability.

shallow crown=less diamond

 

[kcoursolle]

If you have a good return policy with the stone, you could take it to an independent appraiser to have evaluated before setting. They should be able to tell you whether there is a durability issue.

 

[strmrdr]

Date: 9/10/2006 2:58:22 PM
Author: JulieN

Date: 9/10/2006 2:26:46 PM
Author: diamondseeker2006
I''ve only heard that very thin girdles are of concern, so I''m not clear on why Storm said anything to you re: durability.

shallow crown=less diamond

yep

 

[DapperDan]

Shallow crown=less diamond?

I would think that the shallower crown adds diameter to the stone. A deeper pavilion then balances the effect of the shallow crown allowing for a good deal of brilliance but less fire. Am I wrong?

 

[strmrdr]

With shallow crowns with small table there is less diamond over the girdle area therefore the girdle should be thicker to make up for it.

edit: yes it should be a very brilliant diamond and fire will be down a bit.