Hello,
I''ve been reading these boards for over a year but have never posted. I would like to get opinions (of quality and price) on the following diamond. Thank you for any help!
Radiant Cut ("real" Radiant, cut by Henry Grossbard''s company) (GIA lists as "cut corner square, modified brilliant")
1.73 ct
Dimensions: 7.12 mm x 7.04 mm x 4.29 mm (L:W = 1.01)
GIA cert.
Color: H
Clarity: VS2
Depth Percentage: 60.9%
Table Percentage: 65.0%
Girdle Thickness: Medium to Slightly Thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
Polish: Good
Symmetry: Good
I was originally shooting for color and clarity above VS1; but having been looking around for over a year, I have to say that this H color was really indistinguishable when compared right next to otherwise similar E''s and F''s (under both lamp and ambient light). Also, this is a great VS2: there is a single, very tiny (white) inclusion under the loupe, compared to some VS1 with much more noticeable inclusions.
I''m sorry I do not have crown/pavillion. In terms of cut graders available on the web, this fits into some of 1A and 2A categories. The brilliance is actually quite good.
The interesting thing about this particular diamond is what some may perceive as a relatively low height and depth percent (based on what you may read for rounds, princess, etc). However, the diamond looks perfectly in proportion (does not look "short" and the brilliance is there). Also, based on Grossbard''s literature, the depth % is in his suggested range of 48-63%. In my opinion, it seems to "redistribute" the diamond''s mass from height into length and width, ie for a 1.73 ct diamond, it has the length and width of 2.0-2.1 ct diamonds I have seen.
Am I wrong and/or missing something about the color (H), the clarity (VS2), table %, depth %, and L/W? In any case, what would be a reasonable price to pay for such a diamond?
I appreciate any responses, help, and suggestions received. Thank you for reading.
Dave
I''ve been reading these boards for over a year but have never posted. I would like to get opinions (of quality and price) on the following diamond. Thank you for any help!
Radiant Cut ("real" Radiant, cut by Henry Grossbard''s company) (GIA lists as "cut corner square, modified brilliant")
1.73 ct
Dimensions: 7.12 mm x 7.04 mm x 4.29 mm (L:W = 1.01)
GIA cert.
Color: H
Clarity: VS2
Depth Percentage: 60.9%
Table Percentage: 65.0%
Girdle Thickness: Medium to Slightly Thick
Culet: None
Fluorescence: None
Polish: Good
Symmetry: Good
I was originally shooting for color and clarity above VS1; but having been looking around for over a year, I have to say that this H color was really indistinguishable when compared right next to otherwise similar E''s and F''s (under both lamp and ambient light). Also, this is a great VS2: there is a single, very tiny (white) inclusion under the loupe, compared to some VS1 with much more noticeable inclusions.
I''m sorry I do not have crown/pavillion. In terms of cut graders available on the web, this fits into some of 1A and 2A categories. The brilliance is actually quite good.
The interesting thing about this particular diamond is what some may perceive as a relatively low height and depth percent (based on what you may read for rounds, princess, etc). However, the diamond looks perfectly in proportion (does not look "short" and the brilliance is there). Also, based on Grossbard''s literature, the depth % is in his suggested range of 48-63%. In my opinion, it seems to "redistribute" the diamond''s mass from height into length and width, ie for a 1.73 ct diamond, it has the length and width of 2.0-2.1 ct diamonds I have seen.
Am I wrong and/or missing something about the color (H), the clarity (VS2), table %, depth %, and L/W? In any case, what would be a reasonable price to pay for such a diamond?
I appreciate any responses, help, and suggestions received. Thank you for reading.
Dave