Makem
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
- Messages
- 30
I like the cut of the 2.32 more. You'd also be getting an additional 0.2mm in spread, which is the point at which many people start to tell a size difference.
Here are a couple more for you to take a look at.
2.37 Carat Round Lab Grown Diamond F Color VS2 Clarity Ideal Cut | Ritani
2.37 Carat Round Lab Diamond ID Cut F Color VS2 Clarity with diamond report number IGI #LG526265508www.ritani.com
2.21 Carat Round Lab Grown Diamond F Color VS1 Clarity Ideal Cut | Ritani
2.21 Carat Round Lab Diamond ID Cut F Color VS1 Clarity with diamond report number IGI #LG517211090www.ritani.com
Thanks Kim!! Both are within my budget. For the 2.37, is the depth too deep you think?
The inclusions in the 2.37 look bad. What do you think? Might still be eye clean in person thoughNot at all, it's within the acceptable range.
The inclusions in the 2.37 look bad. What do you think? Might still be eye clean in person though
The inclusions in the 2.37 look bad. What do you think? Might still be eye clean in person though
Hi @Kim N I ended up getting the 2.20. I saw both stones in person today and they look exactly the same lol the ritani consultant who showed me the stones said it’d be better if I had two completely different stones and advised me to go with the 2.20 due to the $114 price difference. I checked on stone algo and the 2.20 actually had a cut score of 9.6 vs. 9.5 on the 2.37 (not sure how reliable stone algo is but I cannot differentiate the two stones with my naked eye haha)
That's the best way to do it, letting your eyes be your guide. They both look great in the photo. Congrats on your purchase!
Thanks so much for your help!! I compared them to my earth mined diamond and they honestly look better. Tempted to just keep the 2.20 for myself (I have a 1.7)![]()