Opinion on diamond?

[AprilBaby]

RB
GIA 1.21
6.71x6.75x4.22
H, SI1 (eyeclean)
Depth 62.7
Table 58%
Crown angle 34.5
Crown height 14.0
Pavilion angle 40.8
Star Length 50%
Lower half 80%
Girdle Thick Faceted 5.5%
Cutlet none
Polish VG
Symmetry Ex
Flor none
HCA 1.6

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 10/25/2009 1:53:36 PM
Author:AprilBaby
RB
GIA 1.21
6.71x6.75x4.22
H, SI1 (eyeclean)
Depth 62.7
Table 58%
Crown angle 34.5
Crown height 14.0
Pavilion angle 40.8
Star Length 50%
Lower half 80%
Girdle Thick Faceted 5.5%
Cutlet none
Polish VG
Symmetry Ex
Flor none
HCA 1.6

Hi April

Its a bit deep for my taste, however the rest of the numbers are good. If you don't mind the depth, can you get an Idealscope image for the diamond? Personally I prefer depths of around 60 - 62.4% max so you could look for one with a depth around that range, whats the diamond intended for, a ring?

 

[AprilBaby]

Its already set in a ring. Its actually mine bought a while ago and I think it''s very sparkly but I wondered if it was a good diamond. Thanks Lorelei! So it will face up just a bit smaller than a 1.2?

 

[stone-cold11]

Yap, numbers are good for optical performance, but the thick girdle is hiding some weight. A well cut stone should have a diameter of about 6.87mm. This stone has the spread of a well cut stone of about 1.13c. So you are paying for about 0.08c and not seeing it.

 

[AprilBaby]

Thanks!

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 10/25/2009 2:29:33 PM
Author: AprilBaby
Its already set in a ring. Its actually mine bought a while ago and I think it''s very sparkly but I wondered if it was a good diamond. Thanks Lorelei! So it will face up just a bit smaller than a 1.2?

No worries April. It is a bit deep which is the main factor in making the diamond face up a bit smaller but it isn''t terrible, the rest of the numbers are good so really you have a very nice diamond there!