- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
- Messages
- 101
Date: 8/28/2008 9:19:02 PM
Author: justjulia
I guess one of my questions for you would be why J?
Are you trying to get a larger stone? If you know about Mara's ring, then you are probably familiar with many other threads here, such as how diamond shape affects the appearance of size. Are you set on round? If you go with another shape, like pear, oval, or marquis, your diamond will appear larger for the same weight as its equal in round. A better cut diamond will always offer better light return and affect the appearance by giving the allusion of better spread. Some more poorly cut diamonds will be bottom heavy with poor light return--making it look smaller. Step cuts tend to look slightly smaller with these generally being cut deeper. Some 'off white' or 'winter white' stones are quite lovely--not yellow, just linen white-I had a K that was beautiful this way. I would call the vender and ask them to guide and advise you (i.e., describe a stone as they eye it), given your concerns. Keep in mind, no matter how excellent the cut, a J will still not ever exactly mimic a colorless rock. It will nevertheless be a potentially wonderful stone as all stones have their own personality. Sometimes a little natural blue flourescence helps mask color--ask your vendor about this.
Ditto - the ACA you are considering is gorgeous, make sure you reserve it if you are seriously considering it. As to the J colour, WF will be able to describe how well it faces up to you. A fabulous cut such as the ACA will help any colour grade face up to it's best advantage.Date: 8/29/2008 3:26:09 AM
Author: LittleGreyKitten
Well, I'd say an ACA would be a great choice as far as a whiter-appearing J.
I'd think you could easily drop the clarity though, to either get an even larger stone or a whiter color grade. If your priority (after cut) is to try to maximize size, VS1 is probably a bit of overkill- most SI1s would be the same to the naked eye (eyeclean, that is) and some SI2s too. I'm sure WF would be totally honest about eyecleanliness. (Though of course make sure you're both on the same page about it- what distance and if you can see any inclusions from the bottom/side etc.)
I'd go and look at some Hearts on Fire or other ideal cut (like AGS0) J color diamonds in the general size you're shopping for though. Color is a very subjective thing. Personally, I'd take an ACA J in a heartbeat to get a larger stone. However, I'd drop the clarity before the color though. (OK, I'd probably be looking for an eyeclean SI2 J or K, but that's just me!) You can see color but not the difference between an eyeclean SI2 or a VS1.
Date: 8/29/2008 3:26:09 AM
Author: LittleGreyKitten
Well, I''d say an ACA would be a great choice as far as a whiter-appearing J.
I''d think you could easily drop the clarity though, to either get an even larger stone or a whiter color grade. If your priority (after cut) is to try to maximize size, VS1 is probably a bit of overkill- most SI1s would be the same to the naked eye (eyeclean, that is) and some SI2s too. I''m sure WF would be totally honest about eyecleanliness. (Though of course make sure you''re both on the same page about it- what distance and if you can see any inclusions from the bottom/side etc.)
I''d go and look at some Hearts on Fire or other ideal cut (like AGS0) J color diamonds in the general size you''re shopping for though. Color is a very subjective thing. Personally, I''d take an ACA J in a heartbeat to get a larger stone. However, I''d drop the clarity before the color though. (OK, I''d probably be looking for an eyeclean SI2 J or K, but that''s just me!) You can see color but not the difference between an eyeclean SI2 or a VS1.