Date: 7/19/2007 6:41:02 PM
Author: fanboy
I was operating on a budget similar to the OP's. A 3 carat diamond was doable, but: (1) I'd have to significantly sacrifice color/clarity, and (2) such a stone would be obscenely large on my girlfriend's finger.
I know the general notion on this forum is to go for cut, then size, but at a certain point, 'big' is too big. A 2 carat stone on a petite finger can be quite stunning and will appear fairly large; no one will think it modest. I think that once you've identified your terminal size, you can spend more on color and clarity or go for a high-end setting. $30k gets spent pretty quickly when you consider the premium you pay for a DEF/IF-VVS stone and a custom setting from someone like Leon (another $5-7k).
In short, if 2 carats is as big as you want to go, your budget may just be enough to cover a premium stone and setting. So, no, it's not necessarily overkill.
EDIT: Oh yeah, I disagree with using her friends' rings as a guideline. You can afford what you can afford. If they have much bigger diamonds than you can buy, what the heck are you supposed to do about that? On the other hand, if you can get your girlfriend a bigger stone then her friends', that's great--it should be for her, not them or anyone else.
I don't think an ideal round stone of F VVS clarity would be under $30k for the stone alone, there is a 2.06 G VS2 on the Pricescope search engine in the Cut Quality Search just now and it is over $30k. Just did a search and yes there are F VVS2 for a lot less than that but not H&A and branded cuts.