I personally, would be concerned about very thin to thin girdle....because I''m a Klutz!!! You might want to ask about that......I didn''t look at the Sarin.....but I would be afraid of whcking the stone and chipping it......but then that''s me....
Interesting; I see now. If I were you, I''d ask WF about the what''s the cause for the different data presented a) on their "face" page, versus the "sarin data" view you drill to. The sarin data solves problems associated with it, both in terms of "ex" and girdle. But, again, so far as I know, no other source should have provided the data which is "front & center" apart from their own measuring equipment, since GIA does not provide this.
So, ask them about sources of info. Moreover, ask them for their advice between these two, if it''s down to them, where either seems like good news.
They like the bigger stone. They say there is no difference in cut and color, but the stone is noticably larger. I am getting clarification on those numbers and if they feel the girlde will be a problem. I am sure they will be honest with me.
how did i miss this post...from one WF J lover to another...congrats! please post pictures in the show me the ring forum and also in my J stones in Platinum thread!!