shmurgshmurg
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2008
- Messages
- 36
Alot of you guys have been seeing my posts regarding various diamonds - and you all have provided so much help.
Seriously - thank you. I know I am a pain.
Whatever diamond I buy, I will absolutely get it appraised immediately.
So I found this diamond (in addition to the 2.17 SI2 and 2.06 SI1 I was debating between before). It is an amazing deal. Seriously. The stone is a 2.01 G SI2 Good Cut, VG polish, VG symmetry, no fluoro. I know what you are thinking - "good cut?!?" - but it is a really beautiful stone. I will try to get the GIA cert online tomorrow if I can for your review.
First, it is an SI2, but there are almost NO inclusions anywhere near the center except for one pinpoint in the center listed on the diagram in the certification (there also appears to be some feathering or pinpoints out near the edges - but it appears to be eyeclean). I think it could be an SI1 (but I could be dreaming)! There are no comments outside of "additional pinpoints are not shown."
What I can''t figure out is why the stone was only graded a "good" cut!
Here are the proportions (I think I stated these somewhere else when we were talking about the HCA):
Measurements: 7.86 - 7.94 x 4.97
Table: 60%
Depth: 62.9%
Crown Angle: 36
Crown height: 14.5%
Pavilion Angle: 40.4
Pavilion: 42.5%
Girdle: Thick to very thick (faceted)
No Cutlet.
I am assuming that the reason it was given a good, instead of very good (or even Excellent - depth, table, polish and crown % are all within GIA excellent range - albeit barely), was because of the girdle being thick to very thick.
Is this a big deal? Will the girdle really affect light reflection and sparkle? Should I forget about the stone because of this or does it not affect performance as much as the other various factors?
I ran it on the HCA (we discussed this aspect before) and it scored an excellent 1.8 (way better than the other 2.06 ct excellent cut I was also looking at) and the HCA also said that this "good" cut stone was within the FIC range (which as you guys said before, is not as good as TIC even though some of you prefer FIC).
So what is the deal? Thank you in advance for your help! I will try to scan in the GIA cert tommorow (I have a copy here).
Seriously - thank you. I know I am a pain.
Whatever diamond I buy, I will absolutely get it appraised immediately.
So I found this diamond (in addition to the 2.17 SI2 and 2.06 SI1 I was debating between before). It is an amazing deal. Seriously. The stone is a 2.01 G SI2 Good Cut, VG polish, VG symmetry, no fluoro. I know what you are thinking - "good cut?!?" - but it is a really beautiful stone. I will try to get the GIA cert online tomorrow if I can for your review.
First, it is an SI2, but there are almost NO inclusions anywhere near the center except for one pinpoint in the center listed on the diagram in the certification (there also appears to be some feathering or pinpoints out near the edges - but it appears to be eyeclean). I think it could be an SI1 (but I could be dreaming)! There are no comments outside of "additional pinpoints are not shown."
What I can''t figure out is why the stone was only graded a "good" cut!
Here are the proportions (I think I stated these somewhere else when we were talking about the HCA):
Measurements: 7.86 - 7.94 x 4.97
Table: 60%
Depth: 62.9%
Crown Angle: 36
Crown height: 14.5%
Pavilion Angle: 40.4
Pavilion: 42.5%
Girdle: Thick to very thick (faceted)
No Cutlet.
I am assuming that the reason it was given a good, instead of very good (or even Excellent - depth, table, polish and crown % are all within GIA excellent range - albeit barely), was because of the girdle being thick to very thick.
Is this a big deal? Will the girdle really affect light reflection and sparkle? Should I forget about the stone because of this or does it not affect performance as much as the other various factors?
I ran it on the HCA (we discussed this aspect before) and it scored an excellent 1.8 (way better than the other 2.06 ct excellent cut I was also looking at) and the HCA also said that this "good" cut stone was within the FIC range (which as you guys said before, is not as good as TIC even though some of you prefer FIC).
So what is the deal? Thank you in advance for your help! I will try to scan in the GIA cert tommorow (I have a copy here).