sunnyside74
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2014
- Messages
- 147
thanks much to gypsy, wink, & randG for all their advice. i had picked a lovely-by-stats BN stone and we were all set to purchase when i made a final sweep of some of the PS delers and found a preloved BGD H&A of the same size & specs that I had eyed for a while which had literally just been marked down and now fell into my price range (almost exact same as the BN stone).
2.304 / J / VS2 / AGS000 / table / depth 56.6% / 60.8 % / crown/pav angles 34.6/40.7 (hca 1.2/aga 1a). Given the that we could see all the images (idealscope/aset/h&A) and BGD having a good rep around here we went that route and she got here this AM. lovely stone, totally eye clean, and could not be happier.
Now for the setting question: I'm a surgical resident, and I work a lot with my hands, there's a lot of purell, gloves going on and off... I have had bezel set stones before, and they make me feel like the stone is safe - but i don't like them as much asthetically. i'm partial to the more antique 8 prong tiffany style approach and pave set bands, but I'm worried that's totally impractical given my occupation (and I think engagment rings are to be worn and not left at home, or else I would never wear it...) any suggestions on settings you think would fit the look and hold up to the abuse?
last question - I took the stone to my local jeweler for the and he felt the stone was beautifully cut, but K/L color, SI1 clairty. I've read a lot of the appraisal threads here, and I know the color/clarity grade is always subjective to wiggle room, and the AGS cert should stand - but this seemed to be a big hit on both cut and clarity, and would swing the price point of the stone a fair bit... (no, he is not AGS certifed - the owner is a jeweler who does custom work himself, onsite, and repairs antique jewlery, I've used him the last 6 years I've been here and always found him to be fair. He has performed interim appraisals on a number of my pieces and been spot on as far as color/clarity are concerned when compared against the GIA reports I had for the unmounted stones in these pieces which he did not have access to)... is this something i should be concerned about?
many thanks!

2.304 / J / VS2 / AGS000 / table / depth 56.6% / 60.8 % / crown/pav angles 34.6/40.7 (hca 1.2/aga 1a). Given the that we could see all the images (idealscope/aset/h&A) and BGD having a good rep around here we went that route and she got here this AM. lovely stone, totally eye clean, and could not be happier.
Now for the setting question: I'm a surgical resident, and I work a lot with my hands, there's a lot of purell, gloves going on and off... I have had bezel set stones before, and they make me feel like the stone is safe - but i don't like them as much asthetically. i'm partial to the more antique 8 prong tiffany style approach and pave set bands, but I'm worried that's totally impractical given my occupation (and I think engagment rings are to be worn and not left at home, or else I would never wear it...) any suggestions on settings you think would fit the look and hold up to the abuse?
last question - I took the stone to my local jeweler for the and he felt the stone was beautifully cut, but K/L color, SI1 clairty. I've read a lot of the appraisal threads here, and I know the color/clarity grade is always subjective to wiggle room, and the AGS cert should stand - but this seemed to be a big hit on both cut and clarity, and would swing the price point of the stone a fair bit... (no, he is not AGS certifed - the owner is a jeweler who does custom work himself, onsite, and repairs antique jewlery, I've used him the last 6 years I've been here and always found him to be fair. He has performed interim appraisals on a number of my pieces and been spot on as far as color/clarity are concerned when compared against the GIA reports I had for the unmounted stones in these pieces which he did not have access to)... is this something i should be concerned about?
many thanks!
