alpackie
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2014
- Messages
- 146
Fun fact! JA considers the images on the left as "arrows images" and ASET images as "IdealScope images." 
So I'm having trouble understanding how to read i-scope images with regards to painting/digging. Please help!
1.24 G VS2
This is the one that concerns me the most. Does the ASET show evidence of some digging? Does the i-scope also show a less than ideal cut because of the stark white light leakage?
1.22 H VS2
(ASET requested)
I compare this i-scope image to an ideal one and it's very close! I'm excited to see the ASET for this!
1.22 G VS2
Confused on this one! Although the ASET image shows ideal light performance, the i-scope seems to show some stark white light leakage (non-ideal).
Is it possible that JA is processing their images to make the i-scope images appear better than they actually are?
So I'm having trouble understanding how to read i-scope images with regards to painting/digging. Please help!
1.24 G VS2
This is the one that concerns me the most. Does the ASET show evidence of some digging? Does the i-scope also show a less than ideal cut because of the stark white light leakage?
1.22 H VS2
(ASET requested)I compare this i-scope image to an ideal one and it's very close! I'm excited to see the ASET for this!
1.22 G VS2
Confused on this one! Although the ASET image shows ideal light performance, the i-scope seems to show some stark white light leakage (non-ideal).
Is it possible that JA is processing their images to make the i-scope images appear better than they actually are?
300x240.png)