Need expert help/diamcalc on these 2 round brilliant beauties

[lynwar11]

I''ve been a lurker for quite some time, and you all havve helped so much and am finally ready to make a decision. Vendor does not have sarin/idealscope etc. I''m actually leaning towards #2, because of size and color but was concerned about the 36 crown angle--what will this mean to the diamond''s performance? Can you help?
Thanks!

Diamond #
Round Brilliant
HCA .9
3.22
H color
VS2
Cut Excellent
Depth 62.4
Table 56%
Crown Angle 35
Crown height 15.5
Pav Angle 40.6
Pav height 42.5
Star length 50%
Lower Half 85%
Girdle Thin-Med Faceted
Culet None
Polish Excellent
Symmetry Excellent
Flourescence None

Diamond #2
Round Brilliant
HCA 1.8
3.54
G color
VS2
Cut Excellent
Depth 62.1
Table 56%
Crown Angle 36
Crown height 16.0
Pav Angle 40.6
Pav height 43
Star length 50%
Lower Half 80%
Girdle Med Faceted
Culet None
Polish Excellent
Symmetry Excellent
Flourescence None

 

[whatmeworry]

Hi Lynwar and welcome. The 36 crown angle by itself is not a red flag with those other proportions. Run it by the HCA and it gets a good score, within the AGS and GIA boxes, etc. Here''s a diamcalc rendering of the two, diamond 1 on the left. And as always: your actual performance may vary from the diamcalc. Good luck.

 

[lgchicago]

Date: 12/8/2007 3:57:38 AM
Author: whatmeworry
Hi Lynwar and welcome. The 36 crown angle by itself is not a red flag with those other proportions. Run it by the HCA and it gets a good score, within the AGS and GIA boxes, etc. Here''s a diamcalc rendering of the two, diamond 1 on the left. And as always: your actual performance may vary from the diamcalc. Good luck.

Thanks so much for your help!

 

[bauermj]

Too cool! Which one are you leaning towards?