Hi everyone, I've been visiting this forum for a while and finally am getting ready to make a purchase.
I have found 2 diamonds similar in spects and would really like some insight on which one I should choose
first is 1.1 Ct G SI2, it has twining wisps as main inclusion, it's eye clean according to the gemologist. runs around 5K
However, the zoomed in picture shows a really large crack-like line. The GIA shows only twining wisps and does mention "additional feather" in the comments. Do you think this would cause any issue on durability of the stone? From what I read the twining wisps are not cracks like feather but this line just looks like it'll make the stone fragile.


the 2nd is a 1.14 Ct H SI2, also has twining wisps as main inclusion. It's also eye clean according to the gemologist, runs around 5.2K


Considering both have great cutting. Which one is a better deal / better stone for the price?
Thank you all!
I have found 2 diamonds similar in spects and would really like some insight on which one I should choose
first is 1.1 Ct G SI2, it has twining wisps as main inclusion, it's eye clean according to the gemologist. runs around 5K
However, the zoomed in picture shows a really large crack-like line. The GIA shows only twining wisps and does mention "additional feather" in the comments. Do you think this would cause any issue on durability of the stone? From what I read the twining wisps are not cracks like feather but this line just looks like it'll make the stone fragile.


the 2nd is a 1.14 Ct H SI2, also has twining wisps as main inclusion. It's also eye clean according to the gemologist, runs around 5.2K


Considering both have great cutting. Which one is a better deal / better stone for the price?
Thank you all!