Date: 7/7/2009 1:23:56 PM
Author:mintcc1
2 ct, vs2, F
Ideal Cut
Dimension
depth 63.5
table size 55.8
crown angle - 35.8Date: 7/7/2009 1:38:40 PM
Author: Todd Gray
Date: 7/7/2009 1:23:56 PM
Author:mintcc1
2 ct, vs2, F
Ideal Cut
Dimension
depth 63.5
table size 55.8
My initial reaction is that a total depth of 63.5% is pretty STEEP and that you''re losing some outside diameter due to the total depth - which might make your 2.00 carat face up more like a 1.90 carat - which is important since diamonds are sold by carat weight and there is a significant price increase that occurs between the 1.99 - 2.00 carat mark.
What are the crown angle and pavilion angle measurements? Nobody can tell you very much without those...
Can you post ASET, Ideal Scope, H&A images? These would provide insight into the optical symmetry...
Hi mintDate: 7/7/2009 1:48:19 PM
Author: mintcc1
crown angle - 35.8Date: 7/7/2009 1:38:40 PM
Author: Todd Gray
Date: 7/7/2009 1:23:56 PM
Author:mintcc1
2 ct, vs2, F
Ideal Cut
Dimension
depth 63.5
table size 55.8
My initial reaction is that a total depth of 63.5% is pretty STEEP and that you're losing some outside diameter due to the total depth - which might make your 2.00 carat face up more like a 1.90 carat - which is important since diamonds are sold by carat weight and there is a significant price increase that occurs between the 1.99 - 2.00 carat mark.
What are the crown angle and pavilion angle measurements? Nobody can tell you very much without those...
Can you post ASET, Ideal Scope, H&A images? These would provide insight into the optical symmetry...
crown height 15.9%
Pavil angle - 41.5
Pavil Depth 44.2%
Girdle Thickness 3.4%
Little more info
Culet- .3 %
Girde thickness 3.4%
Date: 7/7/2009 3:52:09 PM
Author: Stone-cold11
Well, 2carat mark does not necessary means you will get a 2 carat face up dimension, which this stone is probably not going to give you because of greater the depth.
What is the physical diameter of this stone? As a comparison, an ideal cut stone should give you a diameter of around 8.15mm.
This looks a bit better but still too deep, the angle ranges aren't the best. If you want to buy online and 18k is your total budget for the whole ring, would you like us to make some suggestions of diamonds which might suit you?Date: 7/7/2009 4:13:35 PM
Author: mintcc1
This report is from AGA - the numbers were wrong from the earlier post/ I was looking at 5 different diamonds and got the numbers mixed up.
Shape: Round
weight 2.00ct
Dimensions: 8.06x7.98x5.08
total depth: 63.3
Table: 55.2
crown angle: 34.9
Pavil angle: 41.2
GIA Color F
GIA Clarity: VS2
AGA Cutting/Proportions grade: 1B ( American Ideal) - Not sure what that means.
Polish: Ex
Symmetry: Ex
for 17900 includes Platinum Tiffany setting and Mounting.
Please comment. THank you!
Date: 7/7/2009 4:13:35 PM
Author: mintcc1
This report is from AGA - the numbers were wrong from the earlier post/ I was looking at 5 different diamonds and got the numbers mixed up.
Shape: Round
weight 2.00ct
Dimensions: 8.06x7.98x5.08
total depth: 63.3
Table: 55.2
crown angle: 34.9
Pavil angle: 41.2
GIA Color F
GIA Clarity: VS2
AGA Cutting/Proportions grade: 1B ( American Ideal) - Not sure what that means.
Polish: Ex
Symmetry: Ex
for 17900 includes Platinum Tiffany setting and Mounting.
Please comment. THank you!
a well cut 2ct should be closer to 8.10mm. this stone has too much "untrimed fats" on the bottom half. think of buying a diamond like buying a steak,look for a lean piece of meat.Date: 7/7/2009 4:13:35 PM
Author: mintcc1
This report is from AGA - the numbers were wrong from the earlier post/ I was looking at 5 different diamonds and got the numbers mixed up.
Shape: Round
weight 2.00ct
Dimensions: 8.06x7.98x5.08
total depth: 63.3
Table: 55.2
crown angle: 34.9
Pavil angle: 41.2
GIA Color F
GIA Clarity: VS2
AGA Cutting/Proportions grade: 1B ( American Ideal) - Not sure what that means.
Polish: Ex
Symmetry: Ex
for 17900 includes Platinum Tiffany setting and Mounting.
Please comment. THank you!
Date: 7/7/2009 9:30:48 PM
Author: oneandahalfrock
This is quite a bit of money you''re spending- why save a grand and compromise on a lesser quality stone?
Is it the instant gratification factor of buying it in person....?
Take your time and get some help from the board- chances are in the long run you''ll get more bang for the buck...
By the way, I''m not a fan a places that let you haggle- it''s one thing to throw in the setting, it''s another to drop thousands off the stone. Makes you wonder what the mark up is to begin with... Is he discounting this like mad to give you a bargain, or because he knows its not a top quality diamond...?
Just a few quick questions/comments;Date: 7/7/2009 11:01:40 PM
Author: mintcc1
Date: 7/7/2009 9:30:48 PM
Author: oneandahalfrock
This is quite a bit of money you''re spending- why save a grand and compromise on a lesser quality stone?
Is it the instant gratification factor of buying it in person....?
Take your time and get some help from the board- chances are in the long run you''ll get more bang for the buck...
By the way, I''m not a fan a places that let you haggle- it''s one thing to throw in the setting, it''s another to drop thousands off the stone. Makes you wonder what the mark up is to begin with... Is he discounting this like mad to give you a bargain, or because he knows its not a top quality diamond...?
my cousin owns a jewelry store, and he gets the diamond from him. I got in contact with the owners and so this is how everything started. They buy raw diamonds and they get it cut and everything done inhouse then sent it out to GIA or AGS for appraisal. When the jewelry store calls them, they sell it to the store. I kind of removed the middle man (my cousin) in this equation. My cousin(very honest) thinks thats a good price for the diamond that i''m purchasing and its a buyers market at this time due to economy.
I wanted a second opinion from you guys.
I was able to haggle the price b/c I was going to pay everything upfront in cash. I guess they needed cash for operating expense.![]()