packrat
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Messages
- 10,614
I didn't take it personally, per se, I was just explaining that the tax dollars that went to help the banks, did go towards helping people as well. It helped to retain thousands and thousands of jobs that would have been lost, and then those tax dollars would have just been spent on feeding the families of those bank workers that lost thier jobs. At least this way, the gov't is getting the money back that they "invested".Date: 1/8/2010 11:31:30 AM
Author: iluvcarats
Date: 1/8/2010 9:32:57 AM
Author: meresal
There are also many many thousands of people that work very hard everyday at these banks that had absolutely NOTHING to do with why things went wrong. How do you determine which 'family' gets help and which gets thrown out onto the street. I started a thread regarding my company yesterday, and we have had 5 waves of layoffs dating back to March of 2008, which was about 6 months before the market fell. If it were not for the government bailout, which my company has paid all of back, there would be thousands and thousands more people needing government assistance... at least this way, the gov't actually gets back, what they put into the problem.Date: 1/8/2010 9:10:09 AM
Author: iluvcarats
Date: 1/8/2010 2:36:26 AM
Author: Cehrabehra
I was on WIC when my daughter was a baby - my husband was military and we were living in a really crappy part of San Leandro while he was stationed in Alameda (for 6 mos of that year he was in the persian gulf) and if you qualify on a military salary - why wouldn't I take it? It was a very hard year financially because rent was so high and we didn't get enough to compensate for that. I've had people give me a hard time about that before, but who cares what they think. My husband was serving his country and getting a pittance for it. I see absolutely nothing wrong with supplementing your income in that way - that's what IT'S FOR.
I had to calm myself down before I could even reply to this. How can we do this to our soldiers and their families? Ask people to kiss and hug their loved ones goodbye, possibly forever,and treat them this way? THIS is where our tax money should go. To help these families who make the ultimate sacrifice for our country. Instead our elected officials vote to bail out banks and insure millions of dollars in bonuses that we will continue to pay for years. It's unconscionable.
As for the woman in question, obviously no one has the right to make that decision for her. Do I wish she had come to that conclusion herself? Yes. But it is up to her. If she needs assistance she should get it. The real losers here are her children who grow up in this cycle, which is tragic. As Neatfreak has so clearly illustrated, Welfare, which doesn't provide much,is at the very least a misnomer.
Our country and our government should be ashamed of how we treat our military and their families![]()
![]()
![]()
Chera WAS given help. What more are you asking the government to do? She said it was a hard time, but they made it thru, which is what the gov't assistance is supposed to do. Help you 'make it'.
ETA:
But this thread isn't about the the government's spending choices... My apologies for getting 'side tracked'![]()
My problem is not with the people who work at banks, so I apologize if that is the way it came across. I resent millions of dollars of tax money going to pay for large bonuses while military families have a hard time making ends meet. I guess because you work at a bank, you are interpreting this as a personal attack, but it is not. And I think that any family who needs help should get it. But I think that we should hold military service in higher regard than we do. Not higher than everybody else, but higher than we currently do. If people are willing to make such sacrifices to protect our freedom, they shouldn't need to ask for government assistance. I am 'asking the government' to treat our soldiers better than they do, and to use our tax money more wisely so that it actually helps people who need it. And incidentally, how can you have a discussion about welfare and not talk about the government's spending choices?