Erin
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2004
- Messages
- 2,783
Kimberly's theater question reminded me of this article I read. I think this is pretty reflective of why kid's beviors today seem so foreign.
Yet such always-on connectivity pose potential downsides. Nishar, who oversees Google’s wireless efforts, said, “Our synapses are becoming hard-wired. We had Generation X and Generation Y. Now we have Generation ADD”—an allusion to the multiplicity of media and communication data streams vying for our attention. If multitasking is an essential trait of the Mobile Generation, what do we lose in the bargain? To be sure, that behavior is not restricted to young people. William
T. Coleman III, founder, chairman, and CEO of Cassatt Corp., said he returns phone calls, listens to CNBC, tracks his stock portfolio, and reads his e-mail while driving to work. He often sees his fellow gym members flit between three TV channels simultaneously while walking a treadmill. “People are learning to multiprocess better. Gamers may have a different set of talents and need to learn how to develop their skills to focus on a single problem.”
Esther Dyson of CNET spoke about the expansive opportunities for mobile applications that “foster interaction among people. These devices are present almost all the time. They become almost part of you. Some large percentage of people with a cell phone sleep within eight feet of it.” She also picked up on the theme of the culture of distraction— the constant pressure to stay engaged and to focus on the now, crowding out reflection and perhaps the ability of younger people to think long-term or broadly. She expressed concern about the long-term societal implications of this trend, citing psychology professor Barry Schwartz’s book The Paradox of Choice: “You don’t have to commit, since you can always change your plans, and you don’t want to commit, because you can always find out about another, newer possibility.”
"I’m concerned about whether kids will learn how to think analytically and structurally if they haven’t been challenged to,” Dyson said. “I worry about something I call Mental Diabetes Type 2—a lack of ability to think deeply and in a concentrated fashion over a period of time. We have too many choices too much of the time. What should I be paying attention to? Will kids develop passion on their own if their attention is distributed too widely? We’re getting a diet of empty information calories that’s overprocessed, oversugared, and too bite-sized. While appealing, it leads to a lack of commitment and satisfaction and ultimately makes you less happy.”
Yet such always-on connectivity pose potential downsides. Nishar, who oversees Google’s wireless efforts, said, “Our synapses are becoming hard-wired. We had Generation X and Generation Y. Now we have Generation ADD”—an allusion to the multiplicity of media and communication data streams vying for our attention. If multitasking is an essential trait of the Mobile Generation, what do we lose in the bargain? To be sure, that behavior is not restricted to young people. William
T. Coleman III, founder, chairman, and CEO of Cassatt Corp., said he returns phone calls, listens to CNBC, tracks his stock portfolio, and reads his e-mail while driving to work. He often sees his fellow gym members flit between three TV channels simultaneously while walking a treadmill. “People are learning to multiprocess better. Gamers may have a different set of talents and need to learn how to develop their skills to focus on a single problem.”
Esther Dyson of CNET spoke about the expansive opportunities for mobile applications that “foster interaction among people. These devices are present almost all the time. They become almost part of you. Some large percentage of people with a cell phone sleep within eight feet of it.” She also picked up on the theme of the culture of distraction— the constant pressure to stay engaged and to focus on the now, crowding out reflection and perhaps the ability of younger people to think long-term or broadly. She expressed concern about the long-term societal implications of this trend, citing psychology professor Barry Schwartz’s book The Paradox of Choice: “You don’t have to commit, since you can always change your plans, and you don’t want to commit, because you can always find out about another, newer possibility.”
"I’m concerned about whether kids will learn how to think analytically and structurally if they haven’t been challenged to,” Dyson said. “I worry about something I call Mental Diabetes Type 2—a lack of ability to think deeply and in a concentrated fashion over a period of time. We have too many choices too much of the time. What should I be paying attention to? Will kids develop passion on their own if their attention is distributed too widely? We’re getting a diet of empty information calories that’s overprocessed, oversugared, and too bite-sized. While appealing, it leads to a lack of commitment and satisfaction and ultimately makes you less happy.”