I'm aware that there is a price premium for these brands but after looking at various rings from Blue Nile, James Allen, Adiamor and various stores in the LA jewel district it seems these luxury brands offer better craftsmanship. I'm kinda partially to Tiffany as their prices were amongst the lowest of the luxe brands and their designs were captivating.
I liked the Embrace for a round brilliant and am also considering the ribbon design.I like how their halo wraps tightly around the center stone with no visible gap like with other deigns. Stones and halos and perfectly centered on the ring as well. A lot of similar copies I've seen had visible gaps between the halo and the center stone and weren't aligned properly. Seems like they use generic settings and make the stone fit whereas tiffany makes custom settings to fit the stone. As for the cut of the stones, Tiffany doesn't always use the hearts and arrows design but nonetheless their stones had exceptional brilliance. Granted part of this is store lighting as well.
The soleste was also captivating with square modified cushion cut. The first halo sits at an angle and underneath the center stone making the center stone look bigger. Their cushion mod brilliant stones were also well cut with none of the crushed ice look though I find that more prevalent in the vintage cushion cuts.
Now the kicker, there's quite a few on the used market at about 60% of original price. For instance there's a .79ct center G VVS2 Soleste triple ex for $7000. This is about ideal for me as an larger center with the Soleste design and it starts looking like a cocktail ring due to absurdity of size IMO.
I've also looked into similar rings from ERD and Canera and the price difference is usually a few hundred, sometimes more sometimes less. If I were to deviate a bit and slightly modify the Tiffany designs then these might be better options but I like Tiffany's designs as is. Maybe there's a combo from these designers with a center from GoG that could be significantly cheaper but I haven't found one.
So, is there anything wrong with going with a used Tiffany ring given the substantial savings?
I liked the Embrace for a round brilliant and am also considering the ribbon design.I like how their halo wraps tightly around the center stone with no visible gap like with other deigns. Stones and halos and perfectly centered on the ring as well. A lot of similar copies I've seen had visible gaps between the halo and the center stone and weren't aligned properly. Seems like they use generic settings and make the stone fit whereas tiffany makes custom settings to fit the stone. As for the cut of the stones, Tiffany doesn't always use the hearts and arrows design but nonetheless their stones had exceptional brilliance. Granted part of this is store lighting as well.
The soleste was also captivating with square modified cushion cut. The first halo sits at an angle and underneath the center stone making the center stone look bigger. Their cushion mod brilliant stones were also well cut with none of the crushed ice look though I find that more prevalent in the vintage cushion cuts.
Now the kicker, there's quite a few on the used market at about 60% of original price. For instance there's a .79ct center G VVS2 Soleste triple ex for $7000. This is about ideal for me as an larger center with the Soleste design and it starts looking like a cocktail ring due to absurdity of size IMO.
I've also looked into similar rings from ERD and Canera and the price difference is usually a few hundred, sometimes more sometimes less. If I were to deviate a bit and slightly modify the Tiffany designs then these might be better options but I like Tiffany's designs as is. Maybe there's a combo from these designers with a center from GoG that could be significantly cheaper but I haven't found one.
So, is there anything wrong with going with a used Tiffany ring given the substantial savings?