Hmm, those statistics aren''t working for me. Chances are, the relationships that didn''t work out as a result of moving in together probably never went to the altar, anyways. So that would make the divorce statistic flawed, right?Date: 11/22/2004 8:194 PM
Author: ClownFishFunk
I personally like the idea of moving in with each other before marriage, I think it would work for the relationship that *I* have. Is this a good move for everyone? No, its not.
Some people argue that moving in together before marriage helps you realize whether or not you could live with this person forever, however I have read statistics that have shown it doesnt have any real affect on divorce rate (that living together or not living together prior to marriage made no difference whether or not the couple got divorced). Has anyone else heard this? I find it interesting.
I''ve heard of some people moving in together earlier than marriage because it helps save them money (i.e. splitting the rent for one place as opposed to each of them paying full for two places).
I do agree with qtiekiki that for some people moving in together is a way to take the next step and then prolonging the BIG step, but only you can know whether or not that would happen in your relationship.
A good combination is generally to wait until engaged, and then move in together (still before the actual marriage).
What are your thoughts? Are you considering moving in with your fiance before marriage?
Hmm, i think the statistics are trying to say that if you are meant to be together, then whether or not you live together before marriage, it will work out...they of course are saying it more scientifically.Date: 11/23/2004 63:33 AM
Author: Aurora Borealis
Hmm, those statistics aren''t working for me. Chances are, the relationships that didn''t work out as a result of moving in together probably never went to the altar, anyways. So that would make the divorce statistic flawed, right?Date: 11/22/2004 8:194 PM
Author: ClownFishFunk
Some people argue that moving in together before marriage helps you realize whether or not you could live with this person forever, however I have read statistics that have shown it doesnt have any real affect on divorce rate (that living together or not living together prior to marriage made no difference whether or not the couple got divorced). Has anyone else heard this? I find it interesting.
I don''t believe that people shoud live together before getting married to get a "preview" of married life. You shouldn''t be engaged if you don''t think that you could work through any living arrangement fights when you''re married! I agree that a lot of the time it makes sense monetarily to live together, but "test driving" a marriage isn''t the way to go.
Colleen
Like you said, a lot of people don''t know what marriage really entail. I am not making a claim that living together will give you great insight or maturity. I just think there are lots of people out there who are not ready for marriage life but dream about being proposed to. Living together is definitely not the same as a marriage but at least it provides a chance for the couples to learn to live with each other. By learning to live with each other, I mean to learn to compromise,and to communicate. I am not to say that couples don''t learn to compromise and communicate in their relationship, but I think a marriage requires a lot more work than a relationship (there are more issues to deal with). I am not suggesting that couples move in together just to see if they can live together but rather living together to learn to compromise and communicate to solve problems/issues that might arise as a result of living together.Date: 11/29/2004 1217 AM
Author: Girls-best-friend
I don''t believe that people shoud live together before getting married to get a ''preview'' of married life. You shouldn''t be engaged if you don''t think that you could work through any living arrangement fights when you''re married! I agree that a lot of the time it makes sense monetarily to live together, but ''test driving'' a marriage isn''t the way to go.
Colleen
I have to completely agree with Colleen. Even if it wasn''t against my religous beliefs I would stills say if the guy or girl wants all the benefits of marriage then he will have to go through with that marriage. I would never agree to marry someone who I didn''t already know I could spend the rest of my life with, living with them, knowing what they are like when they are sick, in a bad mood,what our personal goals for the future are, who''s going to do what chores, etc. the whole nine yards.
I agree there are lots of people who don''t really know what marriage really entails but I don''t think living together is going to all of a sudden give them some great insight or maturity. That comes with time and age. Just because your engaged doesn''t mean your going to still marry that person. So waiting until he pops the question doesn''t gaurantee that he or she will go through with it. I was engaged once before and broke it off because it was a decision I was making completely with my heart alone. My head didn''t agree at all and once out of the relationship I was able to see it much more clearly and realized it was the best thing I could have ever done because once the novelty of being in love wore off we would have made each other miserable.
The statistics do show that most married couples who lived together first end up in divorce. Why I have no clue. I just don''t believe in doing a test run. If I make the commitment and say yes I will marry you then I will stick to that. It isn''t something I take lightly anyway. I have had other proposals from men that I was dating but knew that they were not the long hall guy. Now I can say since I am older and wiser I have made the right choice for my heart and head. Not test trial needed.
Yes getting proposed to is romantic and being in love is great but there is much more to it than that and those things should be thought of before you say yes not after and then say well let me see if I can live with you and then if not we go our seperate ways. Engagements are just as serious as marriage.
Sorry don''t mean to sound like I''m on a soap box and not trying to tell anyone what to do. In the end the decision is each of ours to make alone.
By learning to live with each other, I mean to learn to compromise,and to communicate.I am not to say that couples don't learn to compromise and communicate in their relationship, but I think a marriage requires a lot more work than a relationship (there are more issues to deal with).
I just find it a little strange for you to think it was ok that you broke of your engagement and not think that it's ok for others.
You learned from your mistakes, so why can't others? It's not about a test trial; it's the same idea that you had when you broke off your engagement (maybe "once the novelty of being in love wore off, we would have made each other miserable). For some people, it might take living together to figure that out and you can't judge them with that.
How do you feel about living together before marriage? Good idea? Bad idea? Thoughts?
Sorry don't mean to sound like I'm on a soap box and not trying to tell anyone what to do. In the end the decision is each of ours to make alone.
what exactly is there to do after 10pm anyway???I will admit i was always VERY traditional growing up, and never planned on living with ANYONE until I married. I couldn''t live with my parents until marraige, as I was raised in a VERy conservative and strict home, so that would mean coming home at 10pm curfews on weekends at the age of 25+... and I felt that it hindered my personal growth to do so.
Date: 12/22/2004 2:49:16 PM
Author: diamondgeezer
I will admit i was always VERY traditional growing up, and never planned on living with ANYONE until I married. I couldn''t live with my parents until marraige, as I was raised in a VERy conservative and strict home, so that would mean coming home at 10pm curfews on weekends at the age of 25+... and I felt that it hindered my personal growth to do so.
what exactly is there to do after 10pm anyway???