Link from Wink''s presentation

[strmrdr]

about Paul''s article its archived so I couldn''t bump it so linked it instead.

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/the-intricacies-and-risks-of-diamond-cutting.44301/

 

[strmrdr]

article itself:
http://journal.pricescope.com/Articles/38/1/The-intricacies-and-risks-of-diamond-cutting.aspx

 

[Paul-Antwerp]

Wink is a great guy. But his timing is bad, in a sense that he does a presentation on Infinity-stones, when I cannot attend. Too bad.

So now I am curious what he has been gossiping, and why you are refering to this article specifically.

Live long,

 

[strmrdr]

he showcased one of those stones and mentioned their wouldnt be any more of em.
Then mentioned the article.

ps. your now super-cutter with .02 degree pavilion variation and .05 crown, something for ya to live up too!!

 

[WinkHPD]

Date: 1/25/2007 3:14:40 PM
Author: strmrdr
he showcased one of those stones and mentioned their wouldnt be any more of em.
Then mentioned the article.

ps. your now super-cutter with .02 degree pavilion variation and .05 crown, something for ya to live up too!!

HOLY MOLY you are getting that a little too tight, I believe the numbers I gave were 0.2 on the crown and 0.1 on the pavilion where the industry averages are more like 0.4 and 0.2. Paul can give the correct numbers and maybe if he thinks I am that far off he will stay up later at night! LOL

Wink

 

[strmrdr]

At one point ya misspoke and said .02 and .05 so I was just razzin ya a little :}

 

[strmrdr]

btw I just checked and on the sarin that the company he has do em uses they run .1 to .3 pavilion and .3 to .4 crown over 5 RB''s
It really takes a helium scanner to play the who is tightest game but that''s excellent none the less.
I consider .2x pavilion and .3x crown and under the tightest of the tight and Paul and one of the GOG classic cutters are the only ones Iv seen hit that on a fairly consistent basis.