Lancet retraction of paper suggesting vaccine/autism link

[ksinger]

In honor of the huge roaring debate some time back, about whether vaccines cause autism, here is an update....

Lancet Retracts Study Tying Vaccine to Autism

The End of a Paper That Linked Autism to a Vaccine

and finally, some recent food for thought...

L.A. Confidential: Seeking Reasons for Autism''s Rise

 

[SapphireLover]

Halleluya and about time too

 

[Hudson_Hawk]

Hey Ksinger, this was already posted yesterday on FH&H. Mind if I add your links you the other thread? I think the discussion is still going on.

 

[ksinger]

Date: 2/3/2010 8:26:19 AM
Author: Hudson_Hawk
Hey Ksinger, this was already posted yesterday on FH&H. Mind if I add your links you the other thread? I think the discussion is still going on.

Hey, sorry about that! I missed that thread. I recalled the original thread on this topic being in here, so I just posted here without looking.

 

[RockHugger]

As a mother of a child with autism (vaccinated up to 12 months) and now non vaxing parent of my 2 yr old, I am currious of the underlying reasons the study was retracted. Money being a huge one.

They are right about one thing though, noone is antivaccine. I am not against trying to cure disease, I am against injecting mercury, aluminum, squalene, and other dangerous chemicals into my child.

Its very sad that merck can use its self as a referance to promote vaccines in medical journals....but studies like this are retracted.

 

[kama_s]

Oh boy. Here we go again....

 

[ksinger]

Date: 2/3/2010 9:38:17 PM
Author: RockHugger
As a mother of a child with autism (vaccinated up to 12 months) and now non vaxing parent of my 2 yr old, I am currious of the underlying reasons the study was retracted. Money being a huge one.

They are right about one thing though, noone is antivaccine. I am not against trying to cure disease, I am against injecting mercury, aluminum, squalene, and other dangerous chemicals into my child.

Its very sad that merck can use its self as a referance to promote vaccines in medical journals....but studies like this are retracted.

It seems you''ve already decided the reason is money. I tend to think that Lancet is perhaps concerned about it''s reputation and has been shamed into it. But that''s just me. I don''t have conspiracy mind as a rule.

And there are plenty of people who ARE antivaccine, genuinely so.

Apologies that my second link seems bad: I must have picked up a different window or something, by mistake.