- Joined
- Apr 3, 2004
- Messages
- 33,852
I don't mind pets flying in the plane as long as they are potty trained b/c I don't wanna smell their pooh inside the cabin if they have an accident, but what if I am allergic to dogs and cats should I get off the plane then?
The one thing that bothers me about it, is that a lot of people have their dogs made into 'therapy" dogs by just filling out some paperwork. It seems that makes real therapy dogs who are needed by people less legitimate. My daughters MIL recently did this with her golden. The dog is not a therapy dog, she just wanted to be able to bring him with her more places. When I have been to the LAX to bring DD for a flight, the Southwest line for check-in is filled with dogs. If they are allowed on flights there should be clear rules that the airlines should follow and real therapy dogs should have special exemptions like being able to be out and on the laps of their people. I don't mind that dogs are allowed but it seems like things regarding animals should be more clearly defined.
There would be a certain irony if a parrot was not permitted to fly in a planeIf the pet has the ability of flight, why not?
No way I’m reading that article. I already know what happened and it will just make me cry.
But I do think pets should be able to fly. My dog wouldn’t do well but I can see how some would. I would honestly be THRILLED if I boarded a plane and discovered my seat mate was a dog instead of a human!
When we were house hunting in FL from Massachusetts I looked at what it would take to fly Lucky. It was absolutely ridiculous in as far as price, and there's no way in hell I was allowing her to be considered cargo. I would not have even been able to fly into a preferred airport, costing me more money on my own tickets, so I drove. In fact we drove a total of 3 times, 3 days each trip. The worst of the trip was the first one and only the first leg because we got such a late start. I can't blame her; we overnighted in New JerseyI learned to keep driving and overnight in Baltimore instead! I'm thankful my dog loves road trips, so it wasn't as terrible as it could be for some who's animals don't travel as well.
FWIW, I'm quite allergic to cat dander. Love the buggers, but sneezing, stuffy nose, bloodshot eyes is not a good look! Thankfully doggie dander is not as bad, and grey's dont tend have lots of it.
In the US unfortunately there's been all kinds of bruhaha with emotional support animals. Some chick brought her therapy pig on a flight once. The pig pooped in the aisle (yummy) and was disruptive. They got kicked off eventually.
https://www.cnn.com/2014/11/30/travel/emotional-support-pig-booted-flight/index.html
And someone tried to bring on a Peacock...
Though people seemed to be fine with the emotional support duck
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...e-soars-in-popularity/?utm_term=.c100c29e577d
Its like the friendly skies has turned into a zoo. what next? Emotional Support Cheetah? Maybe Ostrich? Ooo wait, Elephant!![]()
Yeah, that's the problem, people abusing the rules to allow animals onboard that would normally have to go as cargo. It's supposed to be more like what @Bron357 described and it used to be until a few years ago. I think this bad behavior is more common now since people started selling fake service tags for your animal online for like $50....easier availability and more people doing it makes others think it's ok i guess.
I flew my dog in cargo once, it was expensive and stressful but it was the best option at the time. People who have show dogs fly their dogs routinely, there must be some tips out there on how to make the flight less stressful on the animal.