I''ve FINALLY found my diamond...

[hinese]

…I think. The only concern I have is that it is too deep.

1.36ct Princess
''Premium'' Cut (between Ideal and VG)
VVS2 Clarity
G Color
Depth 75.6
Table 74
Measurements 6.00x5.98x4.52
VG Symmetry
VG Polish
Thin to Medium Girdle
No Flourescence

 

[VuittonGal]

Have you seen the diamond in person? A lot of times princess cuts are not able to be measured by numbers alone. (I learned that from the Ideal rocks

) If you saw it and it loved it, you should get it!

 

[Rhino]

Date: 9/16/2005 3:22:59 PM
Author:hinese


…I think. The only concern I have is that it is too deep.

1.36ct Princess
'Premium' Cut (between Ideal and VG)
VVS2 Clarity
G Color
Depth 75.6
Table 74
Measurements 6.00x5.98x4.52
VG Symmetry
VG Polish
Thin to Medium Girdle
No Flourescence

What is this places definition of "premium" cut? If between "Ideal" and "Very Good" how do they define those terms?

The reason I ask is because many firms use what I'd call "fluff" terms to make a stone sound to be something it isn't. I'm not saying the stone is bad or good, it may be fantastic but without known pavilion and crown angles an educated decision can not be arrived at here with this limited data. Unless you have *seen* the stone and compared it with other known performers would I give a thumbs up. If you can't get the angle measurements 2 other pieces of data would help. Either a reflector image (but then those aren't *always* reliable too)... better yet ... a Sarin Scan with a 3d model. Certain Gmen around here (including myself) can take that model and tell you key elements about the stone and give a green or red light on this. Doesn't hurt to ask. btw the depth isn't an issue here IMO.