I am looking to treat myself to a new necklace. WF quoted me for a sapphire and white gold necklace, and I asked BGD for a quote for the following:
A 16-inch necklace in 14k rose gold, with five evenly-spaced diamonds of 0.10 each, totalling 0.50. (FYI, he has a stock version on his website for $1,150 with seven diamonds of 0.07, so totalling 0.50 too.)
The quote is $1,550.
Too much? Good value, bad value?
I asked why it was so much more when the diamond weight is the same. They said that rose gold costs more, but mainly that the jump in price from 0.07 to 0.10 was huge.
So, it's a $400 difference, for the same carat weight. This seems excessive.
On the other hand, I know they do good work and the necklace would be beautiful. N.B. All the diamonds in every example listed would be Brian's signature melee.
I'm not a diamond expert, just an enthusiast, and I would be grateful for some pointers as to whether this is a fair price, or not.
A 16-inch necklace in 14k rose gold, with five evenly-spaced diamonds of 0.10 each, totalling 0.50. (FYI, he has a stock version on his website for $1,150 with seven diamonds of 0.07, so totalling 0.50 too.)
The quote is $1,550.
Too much? Good value, bad value?
I asked why it was so much more when the diamond weight is the same. They said that rose gold costs more, but mainly that the jump in price from 0.07 to 0.10 was huge.
So, it's a $400 difference, for the same carat weight. This seems excessive.
On the other hand, I know they do good work and the necklace would be beautiful. N.B. All the diamonds in every example listed would be Brian's signature melee.
I'm not a diamond expert, just an enthusiast, and I would be grateful for some pointers as to whether this is a fair price, or not.