Is this a shallow stone?

[hgau999]

Can someone comment on what I should expect to see on this stone (fire, scintillation and brilliance)? Would this be considered a shallow stone?

table: 56.7
Depth: 61
CA: 34.7
PA: 40.6
Girdle: Thin
Spread: 6.65-6.67x4.05
Polish: ideal
Sym: Ideal
culet: pointed

 

[hgau999]

aset image

 

[minirita]

I''m not good at these images . But according to the measurement, if the carat weight is less than 1.04 carat, then the stone maybe a little shallow.

 

[hgau999]

It''s a 1.08 ct., F color.

 

[belle]

Date: 11/6/2007 7:25:51 PM
Author: minirita
I''m not good at these images . But according to the measurement, if the carat weight is less than 1.04 carat, then the stone maybe a little shallow.

seriously.

 

[belle]

Date: 11/6/2007 7:16:41 PM
Author:hgau999

Can someone comment on what I should expect to see on this stone (fire, scintillation and brilliance)? Would this be considered a shallow stone?

you should expect to see a diamond that outperforms about 95% of the diamonds you will see everyday.
if you happen to frequent places with high ceilings and multiple light sources, be prepared to be utterly amazed

 

[:)]

Date: 11/6/2007 7:41:12 PM
Author: belle

Date: 11/6/2007 7:16:41 PM
Author:hgau999

Can someone comment on what I should expect to see on this stone (fire, scintillation and brilliance)? Would this be considered a shallow stone?

you should expect to see a diamond that outperforms about 95% of the diamonds you will see everyday.
if you happen to frequent places with high ceilings and multiple light sources, be prepared to be utterly amazed

Amen!

 

[minirita]

Then it should be very well proportioned for a 1.08ct round, congratulations!