LilyKat
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2009
- Messages
- 835
In the process of looking for someone to do my hair and makeup for my wedding, I sent out a few emails to get quotes. I ended up booking with a really nice makeup artist whose work I love. But I thought I should let the other two who had given quotes know that I would not be booking with them, so they could release the date, and as a courtesy. I received this email back from one (cut and pasted):
"No problem anyway, enjoy the biuld up to your day. I'll get booked on your date but there is 3 of us all of us are the same standard so if you are still stuck after your trial it's worth getting back in touch to see if either Danielle and Heidi are available. They are excellent, they helped me with a wedding for ok mag on sunday so their work can be seen in it next week."
She seems to be implying that the artist I have booked with (and I didn't even tell her who it was) would mess up so badly I would need to come crawling back to her. Why would someone imply that about a fellow professional? And the reference to "ok mag" (the UK society magazine OK) seems totally unnecessary (and as her style is kind of outdated, I have my doubts as to whether it is even true).
Not that it matters to me now as I didn't book with her... it just irked me and I wanted to get it off my chest to like-minded folk
Has anyone else come across vendors behaving like this?
"No problem anyway, enjoy the biuld up to your day. I'll get booked on your date but there is 3 of us all of us are the same standard so if you are still stuck after your trial it's worth getting back in touch to see if either Danielle and Heidi are available. They are excellent, they helped me with a wedding for ok mag on sunday so their work can be seen in it next week."
She seems to be implying that the artist I have booked with (and I didn't even tell her who it was) would mess up so badly I would need to come crawling back to her. Why would someone imply that about a fellow professional? And the reference to "ok mag" (the UK society magazine OK) seems totally unnecessary (and as her style is kind of outdated, I have my doubts as to whether it is even true).
Not that it matters to me now as I didn't book with her... it just irked me and I wanted to get it off my chest to like-minded folk
