- Joined
- Aug 15, 2000
- Messages
- 18,916
As a lover of blue fluorescent diamonds I feel not mentioning Internal graining makes it hard for good retailers and savvy consumers to avoid milky hazy fluorescent diamonds.
Simply, GIA miss most internally graining on their grading reports of diamonds.
Because they did their clarity grading with a backlit microscope, they would have naturally missed a lot of graining because the feild of view has little or no dispersion. It is much easier to see graining on the facet change in a video when a facet turns blue or grey from white or black.
A scientist friend explains it this way: "to be seen in a somewhat different "colour", ie wavelength, or intensity, thereby increasing the visual contrast between the grained & non-grained zones, & so emphasizing the visibility of the grain which would be otherwise minimally visible in overall diffused & non-dispersed white light.
This is much easier to see in videos of the stone rotating between pins (as opposed to normal 360 videos commonly used for consumers).
Given that GIA and IBM are digitising and automating AI clarity grading, I expect internal gaining will even more rarely be captured in their clarity grading in the future!
So for all you expert helpers here, please note that when surface graining is noted - there is almost always internal graining.
Here is an example in office type light and in microscope type light (thanks Cutwise!:
cutwise.com
cutwise.com

Simply, GIA miss most internally graining on their grading reports of diamonds.
Because they did their clarity grading with a backlit microscope, they would have naturally missed a lot of graining because the feild of view has little or no dispersion. It is much easier to see graining on the facet change in a video when a facet turns blue or grey from white or black.
A scientist friend explains it this way: "to be seen in a somewhat different "colour", ie wavelength, or intensity, thereby increasing the visual contrast between the grained & non-grained zones, & so emphasizing the visibility of the grain which would be otherwise minimally visible in overall diffused & non-dispersed white light.
This is much easier to see in videos of the stone rotating between pins (as opposed to normal 360 videos commonly used for consumers).
Given that GIA and IBM are digitising and automating AI clarity grading, I expect internal gaining will even more rarely be captured in their clarity grading in the future!
So for all you expert helpers here, please note that when surface graining is noted - there is almost always internal graining.
Here is an example in office type light and in microscope type light (thanks Cutwise!:

EX Round, 1.07ct, F, SI2, VG, EX, MED, +0.7%
EX Round, 1.07ct, F, SI2, VG, EX, MED, +0.7%

EX Round, 1.07ct, F, SI2, VG, EX, MED, +0.7%
EX Round, 1.07ct, F, SI2, VG, EX, MED, +0.7%
