BriBee
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 656
I came across this article today and wanted to see what other PSers thought of it:
http://news.yahoo.com/buying-diamond-ring-learn-4-cs-141247021.html
I was pleasantly surprised when I read "The one thing you should not trade off on is the quality of the cut..." But then I read further and was confused by the following: "For example, for $2,000, you might pick a 1-carat, K-color stone with a slight inclusion, or a half-carat, G-color, with a very slight inclusion. An L or M-colored diamond at that price 'will get you a 2-carat honker, but you'll definitely notice the yellow and you'll see some inclusions,' said Shor."
Ummm, really, did I read this right? Please point me in the direction of the 2ct diamonds for $2,000
The rest of the article contains more "interesting" ideas such as "But long nails don't mix with oval: 'It looks like you've got a weird nail in the middle of your hand.' "
I'll hold back the rest of my commentary for now and see what other people think...
http://news.yahoo.com/buying-diamond-ring-learn-4-cs-141247021.html
I was pleasantly surprised when I read "The one thing you should not trade off on is the quality of the cut..." But then I read further and was confused by the following: "For example, for $2,000, you might pick a 1-carat, K-color stone with a slight inclusion, or a half-carat, G-color, with a very slight inclusion. An L or M-colored diamond at that price 'will get you a 2-carat honker, but you'll definitely notice the yellow and you'll see some inclusions,' said Shor."
Ummm, really, did I read this right? Please point me in the direction of the 2ct diamonds for $2,000
The rest of the article contains more "interesting" ideas such as "But long nails don't mix with oval: 'It looks like you've got a weird nail in the middle of your hand.' "

I'll hold back the rest of my commentary for now and see what other people think...