Idealscope Analysis Assistance!!

[diamondsarehard]

I am hoping to get some thoughts on two idealscopes for two stones I am considering:

1) 1.122ct G VS1
Depth % 60.5
Table % 56.6
Crown Angle 34.0
Star 52.0
Pavilion Angle 40.9
Lower Girdle % 79.0
HCA: 1.0



2) 1.301ct G VS1
Depth % 61.3
Table % 55.5
Crown Angle 34.5
Star 49.0
Pavilion Angle 40.7
Lower Girdle % 77.0
HCA: 1.0



Both are AGS Ideal 0 stones from reputable vendors. Please let me know your thoughts on the two stones and which one you prefer and why.....or if I can do better in this color/clarity and size range. Thanks!

 

[Gypsy]

The photo set up of the second one is odd. But it looks they are both well cut. I'd go for the bigger one or the cheaper one.

 

[Diamond_Hawk]

Both IdealScopes show terrific light performance.

#2 looks slightly tilted to about 1:00 – you can tell by the shorter pavilion main facets located at 12:00 and 2:00. Nice candidates.

 

[diamondsarehard]

Thank you both for your input. There is about $2,600 in price difference between the two (with the second one as more expensive). I think I should be pretty happy with either one....but will need to decide!

 

[SirGuy]

They both look pretty good to me. I like the slightly smaller table on #2. Have ASETs for them by chance? I think you'd do well with either.

 

[diamondsarehard]

They both look pretty good to me. I like the slightly smaller table on #2. Have ASETs for them by chance? I think you'd do well with either.

Thanks Everyone. Here is some additional images of the two choices:

1)
Diamond

ASET

Hearts

 

[diamondsarehard]

And here is the information for Diamond 2:

Diamond

ASET

Hearts


So what do you think of these?!? Thanks all.

 

[luvdajules]

My guess is that if you saw the two side by side, you wouldn't see much of a difference. On paper, I like #2 better, but for the price difference I would go with #1 and put that money towards an awesome setting. The nice thing about #1 is that with the shallower depth, you get a nice spread so faces up closer to the 1.3 ct even though it's only 1.12 ct. My guess is it faces up around 6.75-6.8 mm while the 1.3 ct faces up just shy of 7.0mm?