Hello again,
I had finally decided on a diamond online but it became unavailable as I tried to put it on hold
I found a different diamond on BN but unfortunately the best they could offer me beyond the GIA certificate is a photo of the diamond taken in their lab.
It's a 1.30 ct, G VVS1, GIA EX EX EX
6.98 - 7.01 x 4.32 mm
Fluorescence Medium Blue
Table % 57.0
Depth % 61.8
crown angle 34.5
pav angle 40.8
girdle med - slightly thick
cutlet - none
HCA score 1.4
The photo doesn't look very visually pleasing:
I got the following email back from a BN representative:
"This is why we tend to shy away from photos...because they end up confusing sometimes....more than helping.
Depending on the lighting and angles, we can make a bad diamond look good, and a good one look bad.
Regarding the brilliance, it's a GIA Ex-Ex-EX, so it is definitely NOT dull or dark in any area. It's very bright and lively. No issues there. These diamonds are the best and brightest that people can cut today. What you are seeing is a photo of a diamond in our lab, without any helpful lighting and without a product photographer to make it look its best.
All that to say the diamond is stunning and will more than hold its own when put next to any similarly graded diamond."
I know it's not a H&A diamond and it was not advertised as such. The email from BN would have made me happy yesterday but I learned about optical symmetry today from GOG's website and PS forum and now I may be a bit OCD not knowing anything beyond the GIA certificate and a photo of the diamond. It would be nice if BN has more info than just a GIA certificate for their non signature ideal diamonds. Am I overly concerned for no good reason?
Thank you again!

I had finally decided on a diamond online but it became unavailable as I tried to put it on hold
I found a different diamond on BN but unfortunately the best they could offer me beyond the GIA certificate is a photo of the diamond taken in their lab.
It's a 1.30 ct, G VVS1, GIA EX EX EX
6.98 - 7.01 x 4.32 mm
Fluorescence Medium Blue
Table % 57.0
Depth % 61.8
crown angle 34.5
pav angle 40.8
girdle med - slightly thick
cutlet - none
HCA score 1.4
The photo doesn't look very visually pleasing:
I got the following email back from a BN representative:
"This is why we tend to shy away from photos...because they end up confusing sometimes....more than helping.
Depending on the lighting and angles, we can make a bad diamond look good, and a good one look bad.
Regarding the brilliance, it's a GIA Ex-Ex-EX, so it is definitely NOT dull or dark in any area. It's very bright and lively. No issues there. These diamonds are the best and brightest that people can cut today. What you are seeing is a photo of a diamond in our lab, without any helpful lighting and without a product photographer to make it look its best.
All that to say the diamond is stunning and will more than hold its own when put next to any similarly graded diamond."
I know it's not a H&A diamond and it was not advertised as such. The email from BN would have made me happy yesterday but I learned about optical symmetry today from GOG's website and PS forum and now I may be a bit OCD not knowing anything beyond the GIA certificate and a photo of the diamond. It would be nice if BN has more info than just a GIA certificate for their non signature ideal diamonds. Am I overly concerned for no good reason?
Thank you again!
