cammy85
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2008
- Messages
- 455
I am very new to this forum, and seeing that a lot of other good advice has been given, I was hoping to receive some myself...
I am looking at using two diamonds I already have as side stones for a three-stone ring. I recently had them appriased. They were both F-G-H Color, .31 carat, SI1. The difference is in the cut. He said the one stone had a very nice cut while the other had a slightly deep pavillion. Honestly, I don''t know too much about diamonds, they just both look sparkly to me..
My question is, he said they should be enough of a match to work in a 3 stone ring, would that be accurate? I don''t know too much about the cuts.
Also, for the center stone, I was thinking anywhere from .6-.9 carat with similar characteristics (SI1, good cut, F-G-H color) Would this look ok having these characteristics in a larger stone? Also, I am sure there is a very wide price range, but is there an ''average'' amount I should be looking to spend given those qualities?
Any knowledge would be greatly appreciated. I don''t know very much about diamonds... yet.
I am looking at using two diamonds I already have as side stones for a three-stone ring. I recently had them appriased. They were both F-G-H Color, .31 carat, SI1. The difference is in the cut. He said the one stone had a very nice cut while the other had a slightly deep pavillion. Honestly, I don''t know too much about diamonds, they just both look sparkly to me..
My question is, he said they should be enough of a match to work in a 3 stone ring, would that be accurate? I don''t know too much about the cuts.
Also, for the center stone, I was thinking anywhere from .6-.9 carat with similar characteristics (SI1, good cut, F-G-H color) Would this look ok having these characteristics in a larger stone? Also, I am sure there is a very wide price range, but is there an ''average'' amount I should be looking to spend given those qualities?
Any knowledge would be greatly appreciated. I don''t know very much about diamonds... yet.
