L
Lula
Guest
Hi, Lynn, I, too, have been following your "Bezet-bezel" saga. I love the look of the Bezet, but I agree, the profile is a bit odd.
In my experience with bezels (I''ve had a diamond and several colored stones set in bezel designs) a bezel does make the stone look significantly larger. The .45 stone set in this setting from James Allen that I used to own made the .45 stone look huge -- close to 3/4 carat. But this setting had a thick bezel. I was not a fan of the chunky look of the setting, though. One problem with all this metal is that from the sides all you see is metal -- boring! I prefer to see more of the stone or a prettier, more dramatic profile.
The profile of most bezel settings leaves a lot to be desired, imho. Either they look like a "space helmet" as someone mentioned earlier, or they have a vintage look (James Meyer''s profiles are stunning). The problem seems to be creating a modern/contemporary bezel with an attractive profile. Why is this so hard to do?
Here''s a bezel setting I saw on the Dimend Scaasi website:
Tango
Good luck!
In my experience with bezels (I''ve had a diamond and several colored stones set in bezel designs) a bezel does make the stone look significantly larger. The .45 stone set in this setting from James Allen that I used to own made the .45 stone look huge -- close to 3/4 carat. But this setting had a thick bezel. I was not a fan of the chunky look of the setting, though. One problem with all this metal is that from the sides all you see is metal -- boring! I prefer to see more of the stone or a prettier, more dramatic profile.
The profile of most bezel settings leaves a lot to be desired, imho. Either they look like a "space helmet" as someone mentioned earlier, or they have a vintage look (James Meyer''s profiles are stunning). The problem seems to be creating a modern/contemporary bezel with an attractive profile. Why is this so hard to do?
Here''s a bezel setting I saw on the Dimend Scaasi website:
Tango
Good luck!