How does this stone look to you?

[civictypesi]

1.35 VS2 I
table 58%
depth 61.2%
crown 34.5%
pavilion 40.6%
$6100

based on the following images, can you tell if this stone is a winner? the light images look different - there's no color?

 

[civictypesi]

hearts and arrows - how come it doesn''t look pretty? is it the stone or the production of the image?

 

[civictypesi]

the stone.

 

[civictypesi]

based on the IS, would you classify this stone as "high performance" or "above average"? overall, what is your opinion? please discuss!

 

[Skippy123]

Hi there Here is how it did on the HCA; looks beautiful to me but maybe the others will chime in.

Factor Grade
Light Return Excellent
Fire Excellent
Scintillation Excellent
Spread
or diameter for weight Very Good
Total Visual Performance 0.9 - Excellent
within TIC range

 

[Lorelei]

It looks like an excellent diamond, I can''t see the hearts images clearly enough to really comment on those, but the diamond looks good.

 

[Ellen]

Date: 5/8/2009 7:28:58 AM
Author: Lorelei
It looks like an excellent diamond, I can''t see the hearts images clearly enough to really comment on those, but the diamond looks good.

I can, look again, veeewwwwy closely.

Lovely stone, I say it''s a winner indeed!

 

[stone-cold11]

IS looks good, but hearts and arrows looked a bit off to me.

 

[jet2ks]

Date: 5/8/2009 8:20:50 AM
Author: Stone-cold11
IS looks good, but hearts and arrows looked a bit off to me.

I''d agree. It looks like a nice diamond from the IS. IF it is being sold as a H&A, then I would question that designation.

 

[Daisi2112]

I see the hearts and arrows too, I find it's subtle, but it's there. Not sure if that is a diamond thing or an image thing. But otherwise I think the stone looks nice

 

[civictypesi]

bump