help with three

[ajdubya126]

I know I posted earlier, but nobody responded and I found another diamond I like. Which seems to be the best out of three? I really need some help here. I know bigger is better, but which seems like the best quality? They''re all from WF, and I''d like to pick one to get a picture of and idealscope.

H SI2
Report: GIA
. Shape: Oval
. Carat: 0.70
. Depth %: 59.3
. Table %: 61
. Girdle: TN-TK
. Measurements: 7.40-5.04X2.99
. Polish: Good
. Symmetry: Good
. Culet: Very Small
. Fluorescence: None
$1563.00
E SI2
Report: GIA
. Shape: Oval
. Carat: 0.74
. Depth %: 60.8
. Table %: 61
. Girdle: M-STK
. Measurements: 7.42-5.10X3.10
. Polish: Very Good
. Symmetry: Good
. Culet: None
. Fluorescence: None
$1797.00
H SI2
Report: GIA
. Shape: Oval
. Carat: 0.81
. Depth %: 61.8
. Table %: 58
. Girdle: TN-
. Measurements: 7.25-5.23X3.23
. Polish: Good
. Symmetry: Good
. Culet: None
. Fluorescence: None
$1985.00

 

[Lorelei]

Sorry no one responded. Firstly you need to contact WF and ask them which of the three is eyeclean, if any are, then for you to see pics to decide which appeals to you. You can then go by WF''s expert advice with the help of Idealscope and ASET images which they will help you interpret, along with their very experienced eyes. Fancy shapes are tricky and are best evaluated by your own eyes and those of the vendor helping you. The numbers are a place to start but really don''t tell much of the story with a fancy shape.